NOT one to just use toilet paper, a woman has admitted her bathroom routine wiped the smile off her boyfriend’s face.

He can’t get over the particular way she cleans herself after going to the bathroom, but people think this is a sign of her partner’s poor hygiene, not hers.

3

Reddit user Throwra_bidet couldn’t contain her annoyance at her boyfriend’s reaction to the way she regularly cleans herself after pooping.

The second-generation immigrant has been living with her boyfriend for two years and they recently started living together.

She admitted in a after that he made her feel dirty for using her hands to wash her ass with cheap tools.

“I am naturally discreet about my bathroom habits. Since my parents were Indian, we usually have a bidet attached to our toilet seat after doing number two,” she wrote.

She added that her childhood home had an adjustable extension since things are “different” in the United States.

Since the move, they haven’t discussed adding a bidet to their living situation, nor has it been a priority for them financially.

In the meantime, she has a portable handheld, which can be purchased online for less than ten dollars and “functions about the same.”

This Portable travel bidet costs $8.98 on Amazon and is easy to use.

The Reddit user said that while looking for something in the bathroom drawers, he found her bidet and asked what it was.

“At first he was surprised and I thought he was just curious so I didn’t think much about it until I answered how I use it,” she wrote.

To paint the full picture, she explained the step-by-step process in the post.

After wiping her bottom well with toilet paper, she washes the area with her hands.

She said she holds her bidet with one hand and squeezes it repeatedly to squirt the tap water out of the sink, while she rubs her butt with the other hand.

She then added that she patted the area dry again with toilet paper before performing a seven-step process of thoroughly washing her hands twice with soap.

“I don’t see it any different than washing your butt in the shower after you poop,” she added.

Her husband was “immediately” disgusted by her visual description, which left her feeling “dirty” and “confused and hurt” about using her hands down there.

“Have I ever shamed him for using TP? [toilet paper] exclusively? No. I just request that we both wash there before having sex,” she said.

“Now he just makes me feel like he did something horrible by holding my hands and kissing me.”

She responded that her hands may even be cleaner than his and speculated that her boyfriend probably doesn’t wash his own hands after holding his penis while urinating.

She eventually admitted that she was annoyed and wanted to yell at him for being “ridiculous and childish.”

3

Many Reddit users defended her and spoke about her partner’s cleanliness.

“You just did what you feel most comfortable with so your hygiene feels clean. The fact that he sees you as disgusting when you wash your bottom could have a lot to say about his hygiene,” one person said.

“Do what you need to do to feel clean and take care of yourself. Your friend is really overreacting,” wrote another.

“You’re doing fine, your boyfriend is a childish jerk, and you’re right when you say you’re probably much ‘cleaner’ than him during his after-the-bathroom activities,” one reader commented.

3

A POPULAR home security technology company, Wyze, has suffered a camera breach that exposed users' images to thousands of strangers.

A few days ago, Wyze sent an email to customers revealing that a recent outage “affecting 14 users” actually affected approximately 13,000 people.

1

That is 930 times more people than initially thought on Friday (February 16).

“The outage came from our partner AWS (Amazon Web Services) and shut down Wyze devices for several hours early Friday morning,” said the email, which was also posted on the website. helpforum.

“If you tried to watch live cameras or events in those days, you probably couldn't.

“We are deeply sorry for the frustration and confusion this has caused.”

The breach occurred when Wyze attempted to bring its devices back online after an outage, which the company attributed to AWS.

“This customer library experienced unprecedented load conditions caused by devices coming back online all at once,” the company added.

“As a result of increased demand, it mixed up the assignment of device IDs and user IDs and associated certain data with incorrect accounts.”

Of all the user images shared among users, Wyze admits that 1,504 people tapped to enlarge the thumbnail and watched the video.

Some even took screenshots of the images they saw on other people's properties, and other people's.

All affected users have been notified of the security breach.

But users are not happy with the way Wyze is trying to shift the blame and want to delete their accounts.

“I really don't like it when a company tries to blame a 'third party' for a mistake,” says one Redditor commented.

“Dear Wyze, Whether the error comes from AWS or another third party, from a consumer perspective YOU ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR MANAGING YOUR SELLERS.”

Another Reddit user, who was affected by the breach wrote: “I am so disgusted and angry.

“I already deleted my account but I feel so violated.”

Wyze has used the incident as an opportunity to strengthen its security controls.

“To ensure this doesn't happen again, we've added a new layer of authentication before connecting users to event videos,” the company explained in its apology email.

“We have also modified our system to bypass caching for user-device relationship checks until we identify new client libraries that have been thoroughly tested against extreme events like we experienced on Friday.”

Kim Kardashian has been named as controversial fashion label Balenciaga’s new brand ambassador – one year after the brand sparked outrage with an ad showing kids posing alongside various BDSM-themed items.

The reality star, 43, who previously refused to cut ties with the brand but said she was ‘shaken and disgusted’ by the advert, posted a statement announcing her partnership with the label under its creative director Demna Gvasalia.

The statement read: ‘For several years now, Balenciaga’s designs have been a part of my many looks – and some of my most iconic fashion moments. 

‘This historic fashion house embraces modernity, craftsmanship and takes an innovative approach to design under Demna. 

‘For me, this long-standing relationship is built on mutual trust and a commitment to doing what’s right. I’m excited about this next chapter for the brand and to become their ambassador.’

Kardashian has previously starred in Balenciaga campaigns, walked in their show and accompanied Demna to the 2021 Met Gala. 

Back in November 2022, the fashion house came under fierce fire after it released an ad that showed kids posing alongside various BDSM-themed items. 

Kim initially faced backlash for refusing to cut ties with the brand and praising the way it handled the scandal, despite her claiming to be ‘shaken’ and ‘disgusted’ by the images. 

Since then, she has made her loyalty clear by participating in an ad for Balenciaga’s upcoming Summer 2024 collection. 

Clearly embarrassed by their ill-judged campaign, Balenciaga took the drastic step of wiping its social media pages clean. 

‘I have been quiet for the past few days, not because I haven’t been shocked and outraged by the recent Balenciaga campaigns, but because I wanted an opportunity to speak to their team to understand for myself how this could have happened,’ the Los Angeles-born celebrity said in a statement on her Instagram page.

She continued: ‘As a mother of four, I have been shaken by those disturbing images. The safety of children must be held with the highest regard and anything against it should have no place in our society – period.’

She subsequently reissued the statement that saw some of the wording changed using stronger language adding: ‘any attempts to normalize child abuse of any kind should have no place in our society – period.’ 

However, on balance, Kardashian said that she is comfortable with how the company reacted to the scandal.

‘I appreciate Balenciaga’s removal of the campaigns and apology. In speaking with them, I believe they understand the seriousness of the issue and will take the necessary measures for this to never happen again.’

In an additional post, to both Instagram and Twitter, Kardashian said she was reconsidering her relationship with the fashion brand but had not yet many any firm decisions.

‘As for my future with Balenciaga, I am currently re-evaluating my relationship with the brand, basing it off their willingness to accept accountability for something that should have never happened to begin with — & the actions I am expecting to see them take to protect children.’ 

She was famously introduced to Balenciaga Creative Director Demna by her ex, Kanye West with the couple’s daughters also sporting the brand, too, having recently been spotted carrying four-figure bags from the brand.   

She acknowledge the role her ex-husband had played in the relationship in December 2021 as she spoke at the People’s Choice Awards where she accepted an award for fashion.

‘To Kanye, for really introducing me to the fashion world,’ she said. ‘I fell in love with fashion and I’m so inspired by so many people. But again, this is like a dream that I get to wake up and wear these amazing clothes and try new things and take a risk. I’m so humbled.’ 

At the time, Vogue described it as ‘the peak of Kardashian’s Balenciaga moment.’ 

Balenciaga is owned by Kering; the corporation also owns Gucci, Alexander McQueen, Bottega Veneta, Yves Saint Laurent and Creed. 

On Twitter, users appeared skeptical of Kardashian’s statement at the time with many suggesting only a complete the complete cutting of ties from the brand would be appropriate. 

‘I don’t believe that you’re being sincere at all. I think you were just hoping that it would blow over. There’s no way that they paid for an ad campaign, didn’t look it over thoroughly before they put it out there. Seems like it’s more about money for you,’ wrote one fan.

‘You can’t be that outraged if you’re going to continue to model for them I applaud u for speaking up but the fact that this even happened speaks volumes and so publicly at that. Shame on balenciaga and anyone who still supports them. Things like this don’t deserve a second chance,’ added another. 

‘Coming from a fan of you for many years this isn’t good enough. Now maybe you couldn’t of done anything then but you can now cut ties with balenciaga at least! Ain’t no one forgetting this one there’s no excuse big enough to cover what everyone saw,’ echoed a third.

‘No. They were promoting child sexual abuse. How on EARTH can you say they ‘understand the severity’ and still work with them, especially as a mom?? This shows how sheltered you are. No concept of the impact this has on victims. Disgusting,’ responded one user. 

Balenciaga publicly apologized and announced that it will be swiping off the ad from all of its social media profiles. 

‘We sincerely apologize for any offense our holiday campaign may have caused. Our plush bear bags should not have been featured with children in this campaign. We have immediately removed the campaign from all platforms,’ the high-end luxury house shared on Instagram. 

By Zak Wheeler for Daily Mail Australia

Published: 06:52 EST, December 20, 2023 | Updated: 09:45 EST, December 20, 2023

Nat Barr is shocked after discovering that murderers, rapists and child molesters released from immigration detention can sue the government for millions following a Supreme Court ruling.

The court’s ruling that indefinite immigration detention was unlawful ignored a legal precedent that had existed for two decades and was believed to directly impact 93 asylum seekers.

Many of them had been convicted of serious criminal offenses and had failed a good character test, or were feared to pose a threat to national security, but could not be deported for various reasons.

Seven News political editor Mark Riley told the Sunrise host that even the most perverse asylum seekers who have been released have the right to sue taxpayers for unlawful detention after the Supreme Court ruled their detention was unconstitutional.

Three of those released are murderers, one of whom killed a pregnant woman in Malaysia, and another previously jailed for raping a 10-year-old boy in Sydney.

“The government cannot take these people into custody again, at least until the Supreme Court announces the full reasons for that rather surprising decision last week,” he said.

“What are the consequences,” Barr asked.

“There is a legal issue here about what the Supreme Court actually found, and the implications for hundreds of people in custody,” Mr Riley explained. ‘Whether they too can now apply for release on the basis of this decision.

“There are refugee advocates and lawyers crawling over this – and we’ll see the implications of that very soon.

“The people who are now released have the opportunity to sue the government and remember, the government has no money, the taxpayers have money, so they can sue taxpayers for millions of dollars for illegal incarceration.”

‘Real? For the time they’re in it?’ replied a clearly shocked Barr.

“Under Australian law, they now have the right to sue taxpayers for millions of dollars in compensation,” Riley responded.

‘Murderers, rapists, child molesters, the rest are on equal footing. That is the law,” he explained.

Barr responded saying, “Wow. Including the pedophile who raped the 10 year old boy, the murderer, the rapist. This is terrible.’

The shock development comes as Home Secretary Clare O’Neil introduces a series of tough new visa conditions for released prisoners, including ankle tracking devices and curfews.

“If I had any legal power to do this, I would keep all those people in custody,” Ms. O’Neil said Thursday. “Some of these people have committed deplorable, heinous crimes.”

“So for the people who have been released from detention, we didn’t want to release these people from detention, but we have a simple message for them,” she said.

‘We impose the strictest possible conditions on you. If you don’t follow them, you’ll end up back in jail.”

Immigration Minister Andrew Giles reiterated that the Commonwealth Government was against the release and that the Supreme Court ruled against it.

But opposition leader Peter Dutton accused the minister of not being prepared for the decision.

“If there was another option available – and I honestly believe there is – they could have stopped these people from taking to the streets,” he told Sydney radio 2GB.

Mr Giles said the government had continued to look at “all regulatory and legislative options” but was hamstrung in its response because the Supreme Court’s reasons for the decision had not yet been published.

The government has sought advance advice on options depending on the different outcomes of the court ruling, he added.

Nine of the 83 asylum seekers released into the community are being housed in a taxpayer-funded motel in Western Sydney.

They will support themselves with at least $550 a fortnight from the government’s Status Resolution Support Service, as well as being provided with free Medicare.

Daily Mail Australia approached several residents of the motel in Sydney’s west who were seen roaming freely on the premises on Wednesday and were met with a barrage of abuse.

There is no suggestion that everyone in the photo is a criminal or asylum seeker, just that they all went in and out of the motel on Wednesday.

A heavily tattooed man, wearing a shirt and rolling a cigarette, did not say whether he had been released from detention but made clear he did not want to be interviewed.

“Get out of here,” the man shouted. ‘What the hell are you doing?

“Go the fuck away. I’m calling the police. We are all innocent people here. Why are you trying to talk to us? What are you doing?’

Two police officers had previously spent more than half an hour in the motel, which can only be entered with a pass or after speaking to reception via an intercom.

When asked if she could comment on the Villawood inmates, a woman behind the desk said, “No, you can’t, thank you.”

A man who spent much of the day outside on his cell phone confirmed he was a detainee but twice refused to discuss his situation.

“I’m from Villawood,” he said. ‘I talk to family. Then please.”

Another young man walking around with his cell phone said, “I don’t want to talk to you.

Kevin Federlin has denied that his ex-wife, Britney Spearsuses drugs.

News reporter Daphne Barak claimed to the Sun and the Daily mail earlier this month she had a conversation with Federline, 45, about Spears, 41.

“I’m afraid she’s on meth — I’ve been praying someone would go public and wake her up. It’s terrifying. She’s the mother of my boys,” Barak claimed the former dancer told her about the intersection actress, in an article published on Saturday, June 10.

Federline, who with Spears is raising sons Sean Preston, 17, and Jayden James, 16, strongly denied the allegations.

“It saddens our family that Daphne Barak and Erbil Gunasti have decided to fabricate lies and publicize the heartache our family endured along with the trauma of our underage children in the Daily mail And The sun,” the Celebrity Fit Club alum wrote in an Instagram Story statement dated Sunday, June 11. “We allowed Daphne & Bill into our home because we trusted them, but that trust was lost and we cut ties in March for many reasons why we choose not to move in here. It is very distressing that she continues to harass our family when we have repeatedly asked her to leave us alone.”

Federline – who also shares kids Kaleb and Kori with ex Shar Jackson and two daughters with wife Victoria Prince — noted that he and his sons spoke to both Barak and Gunasti “a few times,” but only in a “respectful manner with love and compassion for Britney and the Spears family.”

The DJ concluded: “The lies and attempts to exploit minors as clickbait is another appalling example of where certain journalism unfortunately stands today.”

Spears has apparently also responded to the allegations. “The fact that people are claiming things that aren’t true is so sad,” she wrote via Instagram on Sunday. “This may not even be the case [my sons] say things like that because it doesn’t make sense to me for them to say that. … It makes me sad because I tried so hard to make things fun [Preston and Jayden] and it was never good enough. So you go behind my back and talk about me, it breaks my heart. It’s sad because everyone just sits back like it’s okay to make up lies to that extent.”

The “Stronger” singer and Federline were married between 2004 and 2006. After their divorce, they continued to co-parent Sean Preston and Jayden before Spears became at odds with her boys.

“I think Mum has struggled to give both of us attention and show us the same amount of love and I don’t think she’s shown Preston enough and I’m really sorry about that,” Jayden told the newspaper. Daily mail in September 2022. “We’ve both endured so much pressure in the past that this is now our safe place, to process all the emotional trauma we’ve been through to heal our mental state.”

Spears responded to his allegations via her Instagram at the time, noting that she was “trying my best to be the best person I can be” while under her conservatorship. (Spears was placed under guardianship by her father, Jamie Spears, in 2013 after a series of public battles. It was finally terminated in November 2021.)

Us weekly confirmed earlier this month that Federline was planning to move his brood to Hawaii, a move Britney has agreed to.