Blake Lively is firmly behind the New York Times while the publication is fighting to be removed from the enormous court case of Justin Baldoni of $ 250 million.
The outlet submitted a motion on Friday to a federal court in New York and defended the report on the allegations of Lively against Baldoni, according to Deadline.
The NYT claims that her reporting on the claims of Liverse sexual harassment against Baldoni was honest and accurate, while claiming that Baldoni and Wayfarer Studios 'unilateral' accusations are not relevant to publication.
“The Wayfarer Parties Fac tells a one -sided story that has collected many headlines,” according to the application, according to the exhaust valve. “But the Times does not belong in this dispute.”
A spokesperson for Lively also supported the motion and told the exhaust valve: “In his motion to dismiss, the New York Times rightly evokes the court case of Justin Baldoni for what it is: a shameless PR document that has no business in a court.”
The representative added: 'For years Baldoni encouraged men to listen to and to believe women. But when a woman spoke about his behavior, he and his billionaire Backer Steve Sorowitz used a social media fighting plan 'to burn the earth and' buried 'it and' destroy 'it together with the media that report about it.'
Blake Lively is firmly behind the New York Times while the publication is fighting to be removed from the massive $ 250 million lawsuit of Justin Baldoni; (seen in February)
The outlet submitted a motion on Friday to a federal court in New York and defended its report on the accusations of Lively against Baldoni, 40, with regard to alleged misconduct on its set ends with us, according to Deadline; (seen in 2023)
The representative continued: “These bullying tactics will not survive in court, and everyone should see his deserving claims for what they are.”
In an article of December 21, we can Bury Bury everyone: In a Hollywood outright machine, the New York Times shed light on allegations of sexual harassment and retribution made by Lively Against Baldoni during its production ends with us.
After this Baldoni and his PR team submitted a $ 250 million lawsuit against the Times on December 31.
Although the first lawsuit has been withdrawn in California, the Times has been added to the changed complaint from Baldoni in New York, who also mentions the husband Reynolds of Lively, and their publicist Leslie Sloane.
'In de loop van hun eerste gewijzigde klacht van 224 pagina's (“FAC”) (plus een toegevoegde tijdlijn van 168 pagina's), vertellen de Wayfarer-partijen ademloos hun kant van een voortdurend Hollywood-drama met acteurs Blake Lively (“Lively”) en Justin Baldoni (“Baldoni”), de sterren van de film, de sterren van de Film die met ons wordt ingediend.
'The FAC has achieved obvious goal to a certain extent; The story of the Wayfarer parties has been reported in recent weeks by countless news broadcasts. However, what the FAC did not do is to argue a feasible claim by time. '
For each deadline, the memorandum added to the dismissal movement: 'During their Blunderbuss -complaints, the Wayfarer parties try to drag the time to their larger feud with Lively.
“But the only thing that the Times would have done is to make an article and publish an article and video about the wayfarer/lively dispute.”
A spokesperson for Lively also supported the motion and told the exhaust valve: 'In his motion to dismiss, the New York Times calls the court case of Justin Baldoni for what it is: a shameless PR document that has no company in a court' (Lively and husband Ryan Reynolds in August)
The publication argues that its involvement was limited to standard news limits and reporting on Lively's complaint, submitted to the California Civil Rights Department, per deadline.
The legal team of Times, ', claimed the Times' Legal Team to tackle the accusations of collusion with the Lively and the Familated Reporting Team.
No hearing date has been established for the motion to fire.
Danielle Rhoades Ha, a spokesperson for The Times, said Deadline: 'As our motion shows, this case should never have been set against the New York Times.
'Blake Live concerned serious concerns about the way she was treated on the set and after the release of the film. We have done exactly what news organizations should do: we have informed the public of the complaint she filed with the California Civil Rights Department.
Mr Baldoni's mis -taxable campaign by time – asking for our ethics, in an attempt to discredit our report, to make an unfounded lawsuit – will not silence us. '
