The president was accused of emphasizing exclusive access to the White House for Big Bucks. Members of the congress were indignant, with a prominent republican who attacked him for the use of “probably one of the more sacred places in America” to rake in cash. Months of high -profile hearings of congress followed.
That was in 1997, when President Bill Clinton was examined for inviting campaign donors to spend the night in the famous Lincoln’s sleeping room of the White House, which led to a fire storm around claims that he shamelessly exploited the presidency.
Almost three decades later, President Trump has drawn allegations of corruption and self-department for public flirting with accepting a luxury Jet of $ 400 million from Qatar and an exclusive tour of the Landclub and a tour of the White House for the largest buyers of his Crypto-Munt.
But the Republicans who control the congress do not yet rush to convene investigations. As often the case when the actions or words of Mr. Trump put him in the middle of a controversy, the top laws of the Gop are not in a hurry to question the president or to strengthen the criticism.
“This is a hypothetical,” said the Senate -Meerry Leader, John Thune by South Dakota, on Tuesday when he was asked if he felt comfortable when the jet donates. If the issue goes beyond the hypothetical stage, he said: “I can assure you that there will be enough control over what that scheme could look like.”
For those who were entangled in Lincoln’s bedroom years ago, the acceptance of Mr Trump’s activities within his own party to say the least.
“Where is the hue and cry?” Terry Mcauliffe, a good Clinton friend and leading fundraiser for his presidential campaigns that later became Governor of Virginia, asked for Mr Trump. “It’s just amazing for me the double standard that continues.”
At the moment, the majority of Democrats’ criticism, such as the Senate Line Leader, Chuck Schumer of New York, who said on Tuesday, he would block all political nominees of the Ministry of Justice until Mr. Trump and attorney General Pam Bondi answered about the Jet. His relocation could delay the consideration of dozens of senior officials, as well as federal prosecutors and Marshals.
Mr Schumer called Mr. Trump’s suggestion that he would accept the plane “so corrupt that even Putin would give a double take”, referring to the Russian leader, Vladimir V. Putin.
“And how do the Republicans respond?” he asked. “With silence.”
However, there has been some noise from members of the Gop who express unrest about the scheme.
“If Qatar gives an aircraft to the President of the United States, it seems to me that asking whether the administration would be in accordance with the Gift Kwet,” said Susan Susan Collins, Republican van Maine, one of the few current senators who also served at the time of the Clinton funds and one of the few destruction.
In an interview on Fox News, Senator Rand Paul, Republican of Kentucky, said that he did not “think it’s a good idea” to accept the plane, adding that there was an “appearance of inappropriate”.
Senator Ted Cruz, Republican of Texas, raised the concern about national security about the Qatari jet and noticed the support of Hamas and Hezbollah through the golf nation.
“I also think that the plane causes significant espionage and surveillance problems,” he said CNBC. “So we will see how this problem is happening – but I am certainly worried.”
Even some of the most fiery conservative allies of Mr. Trump in the Maga world, such as the extreme right-wing activist Laura Loomer and the Podcaster Ben Shapiro, have said that Mr. Trump must reconsider the gift in view of the record of the Donorland about human rights.
Other Republicans eagerly went on the side of Mr Trump, who said earlier that it would be stupid to refuse such a gift, since the potentially American taxpayers would save money.
“I am completely in favor,” said Senator Tommy Tuberville, Republican of Alabama. “If they offer him a plane – those we have received, it will cost a fortune to continue.”
Gifts and efforts to redeem the White House have long been a sensitive subject and lesser authorities have led to serious consequences.
In a famous episode from 1958, Sherman Adams, Chief of Staff of President Dwight D. Eisenhower, was forced to resign after the unveiling that he had accepted a Vicuña overcoat and expensive trug from a friend in New England with business interests before federal agencies. The Lord Eisenhower was reluctant to let him go, but he went.
“As a result of this entire incident, we all had to be informed of one truth in America: this is that a gift is not necessarily a bribery,” the Heer Eisenhower told reporters.
The Clinton Fund-Raising test was prompted by revelations that some of Mr. Clinton’s important donors were treated to overnight stays in the respected Lincoln bedroom room and were invited to coffee shops and golf outings. The revelations led to requirements for a special counselor, although Attorney General Janet Reno refused to appoint one.
Mr. Clinton insisted that he had done nothing wrong and said that although the overnight guests might have been powerful contributors who gave millions of dollars to his campaigns, they were also his friends.
“I had no strangers here,” Mr. Clinton said at a News Conference Witte Huis in February 1997. “Lincoln’s bedroom has never been sold. That was another false story that we have to endure, and the facts will show what the truth is.”
Senator John McCain, the Republican and later presidential candidate of Arizona who was a leading in favor of tighter lines for campaign financing, said he was nevertheless disappointed in the president.
“The president of the United States was, when trying to raise money for his re-election, willing to use the Lincoln bedroom room, probably one of the more sacred places in America to win those financial funds that he thought they were needed,” Mr. McCain said.
Republicans who controlled the Senate, hearing hearings together by the Government Affairs Committee, who ultimately produced dueling republican and democratic findings that fundraising activities of both parties were ethically doubtful, although not illegal. That report, and one by the Huis Oversight and Government Reform Committee, helped to stimulate the approval of the revision of Mr. McCain’s campaign financing about four years later.
Mr. Mcauliffe noted that for all claims and insinuations that swirled around the Lincoln bedroom match, there was never a hint that Mr. Clinton tried to benefit personally during his years Witte Huis.
Mr. Trump’s behavior, on the other hand, has drawn accusations of corruption, since he even before he started his first term, when he refused to repel his huge business companies when he accepted the presidency. His recent activities, including the launch of the $ Trump Memecoin with which investors all over the world can enrich him and his family, went much further.
“Nobody said the Clintons in the White House enriched themselves,” said Mr. Mcauliffe. “He left the office broke, broke, broke.”
- Advertisement -
