The founder of an alone-feminine app who lost a milestone 'What Is a Woman' case now brings her fight for the United Nations and calls on the global body to intervene with the Australian government.
Sall Grover, who has founded Giggle, an online platform for women, has filed a formal complaint to the Human Rights Committee of the United Nations (UNHRC), who challenges the Australian government about a statement by a federal court that “has been changed”.
Mrs. Grover had banned transgender wife Roxanne Tickle, 54, from her app in 2021, with the argument that it was for women and Mrs. Tickle was biologically male.
Mrs Tickle had identified as a woman since 2017, operated on two years later and received a new birth certificate that mentions her sex as a woman.
In September Justice Robert Bromwich discovered that Mrs. Tickle had suffered indirect discrimination and Mrs Grover ordered to pay $ 10,000 compensation – a small group of the $ 200,000 that was requested – and to cover legal costs.
The 'Tickle vs giggle' case made worldwide headlines because it is one of the first times that the question 'what is a woman' was tested in the courts, whereby the judge judged sensational that 'sex is changeable'.
Mrs. Grover, 40, is an appeal to that decision and is willing to go all the way to High Court.
But her case now has worldwide consequences after her complaint at the UNHRC, while she wants to dispute the court's decision that has effectively deleted the legal recognition of sex as a protected category in Australia.
Sall Grover (photo), who has set up Giggle, an online platform for women, has filed a formal complaint to the Human Rights Committee of the United Nations (UNHRC)
The mother of one said that the statement had already established a dangerous precedent, with the prohibition of only female lesbian events.
“This is not a cultural war; This is about the fundamental human rights of women and girls, “said Grover.
'Women fought generations to have spaces that are free from male presence – whether in crisis relief, prisons, sports or social networks.
'That right has now been removed by an activist legal interpretation that forces women to accept men in only female spaces and punish them for the objection. That is not progress; That is oppression. '
Mrs. Grover claimed that her case is not isolated and that large institutions, such as the Australian Human Rights Commission, were 'imprisoned' by transgender ideology at the expense of women.
“These institutions have re -defined gender protection without public consultation and giving priority to gender identity above the material reality of sex,” she added.
The entrepreneur and businesswoman wanted to emphasize that her fight was not an 'cultural war' imported from the United States, where President Donald Trump recently moved to prohibit transgender women to participate in female sports.
'This is not about left or right. Culture Wars is an expression used by politicians and media to close the debate, an anti-free speech mechanism,, “MS Grover added.
In September Justice Robert Bromwich discovered Roxanne Tickle (shown) an indirect discrimination and Mrs Grover had ordered to pay $ 10,000 damage – a small group of the $ 200,000 that was requested – and to cover legal costs. This publication in January revealed in January that Mrs Tickle had submitted a cross, the oversell from the Upirect to direct discrimination
'This is about whether women and girls have the right to say' no 'to men in their spaces.
'The ruling of the federal court not only forces inclusion – it forces speech, as a result of which women have to adjust their language and beliefs to accommodate the ideology of gender identity.
“That is a abuse of power, and it is completely at odds with the human rights obligations of Australia.”
Mrs Grover's entry to the UNHRC argues that the Federal Court pronunciation VIulates women's rights under international law by eliminating sex as a legally protected category and forces women to address men as women.
She is Calls the UNHRC to intervene before the giggle occupation is heard in August to ensure that “the Australian government is held responsible for its wrong interpretation of international human rights legislation.”
“This case will determine whether women and girls in Australia still have legal rights,” said Mrs. Grover.
'We cannot allow non-selected bureaucrats to delete for decades of heavily fought protection through Stealth and activist legal interpretations.
“If Australia refuses to maintain sex -based rights, the world must know.”
Daily Mail Australia revealed in January that Mrs Tickle had submitted a Cross application to increase the finding of the court of indirectly to direct discrimination.
Mrs Tickle is also intended to significantly increase the damage and worsened damage than the initial compensation of $ 10,000 and legal costs, which were covered at $ 50,000.
It came when Mrs. Grover was planning to meet Harry Potter author and prominent gender critical activist JK Rowling in the UK.
The author had promised her 'total solidarity' to Mrs. Grover in her lawsuit.
