The pressure is growing on the birth to fulfill their election promise to scrap migrating hotels – with the home office still to commit to an end date.
It is because the total costs of adjusting asylum seekers in hotels are now £ 5.5 million every day, according to figures obtained through time.
The number of migrants living in hotels at the expense of taxpayers has also risen by 8,500 under work.
The increase comes despite their election manifesto to “end asylum hotels, which saves the taxpayer billions of pounds.”
Figures showed that there were 38,079 in hotels at the end of December, compared to 29,585 at the end of June – an increase of 29 percent.
However, government sources have said that Angela Rayner is putting pressure on, among other things, to delete the policy.
An insider said to the Times: “She wants a certain date instead of floating.”
It is understanding that she wants the government to terminate contracts that they have concluded with private companies to accommodate migrants.
A group of men can be seen outside one of the hotels that currently house migrants in November
Government sources have said that Angela Rayner is putting the birth, among other things, to scrap migrant hotels
A concerned group gathered in Manchester to protest against asylum seekers who are housed locally
Contracts with Serco, Clearsprings Ready Homes and Mears are worth no less than £ 4.6 billion.
Nevertheless, the Home Office still has to determine a clear end date on migrant hotels, because it does not want to commit to 'random goals'.
A source said: 'Setting a date would set us to fail. We don't want to become a hostage for the fortune as we saw under the failed commitments of the last government. '
The only vague period of time given by the department was the best official in the Department, the best official in the Department last month.
He told MPs that the goal is to 'reach' zero at the end of the parliament, leaving the possibility that migrant hotels could stay until August 2029.
The most important problem that the government is confronted is the lack of other alternatives – where the party says it does not want to use large sites such as former RAF properties.
However, the delay in the closing of migrant hotels has been criticized by the conservatives.
Shadow Home Secretary Chris Philp said earlier: 'Despite promising the hotel use for asylum seekers, the figures have risen again and they cost British dear.
Anti-immigration demonstrators collision with members of stand up to racism outside Cresta Court Hotel in Altrincham
The number of asylum seekers living in hotels at the expense of taxpayers has risen 8,500 under work (shown: Sir Keir Starmer)
Migrants wave to the boat of a smuggler in an attempt to cross the English canal, on the beach of gravelines, near Dunkirk, North France on April 26, 2024
'Removals from small boat arrivals are again under the birth, with only 4 percent of the small boat arrivals that are removed. Does the Labor government really think that leaving 96 percent of the illegal immigrants who stay here put someone off? '
From the start of the canal crisis in January 2018 to the end of December 2025, 151.161 Migrants reached Britain with a small boat. But only 4,995 have undergone forced or voluntary removal from the country.
Last year there was a total of 8,164 forced reports of immigration delinquents and foreign criminals, an increase of 28 percent compared to the previous 12 months, but still sent back far below 15,000 annually in 2012 and 2013.
Mihnea Cuibus, from the Migration Observatory of Oxford University, said: 'The government has so far difficult to reduce the number of asylum recisions in supported accommodation.
'The combination of more refusals, a long backlog in the courts, and a moderate increase in asylum applications by the end of the year have all contributed. As a result, the Labor Party has not made much progress so far in the direction of its goal of terminating the use of hotels for asylum seekers. '
MailOnline has contacted the Home Office for Comment.
