The scientific branches in the US and the UK have been merged to prevent discussion about the origin of the COVID pandemia – the most deadly disturbing social, economic and political crisis since the Second World War.
It sounds imaginative, indeed impossible, in this era of transparency and accountability. But disgraceful for those involved, the evidence strongly suggests that this is what happened.
Five years later, the public must know – and receive an explanation.
Thanks to my intelligence background, and with input from a crack team of experts in Virology, Big Pharma and Geo strategy, we already knew the truth in March 2020 and the government warned. They can't say they didn't know.
This elephant in the room has so far escaped the attention of most people. Yet the Hallett research into the pandemia did not even try to investigate how it started. Isn't that strange?
By the spring of 2020 it was clear that the SARS-COV-2-Virus Laboratory had improved in Wuhan, China, with some American academic aid, to make it super infectious by what is called 'profit of function'. A detailed paper track in scientific publications in 2012 registered the linked experiments, and the virus itself showed convincing proof of inserts in its 'peak' protein
The objective of this risky joint research, partly funded by money originally from US government subsidies, had been to investigate infectiousness for people – a surprising cooperation in a laboratory that also had links with the Chinese liberation army of the Chinese people.
The chance that SARS-COV-2 could of course be and had jumped species from bats to people was many thousands against one opposite of the fact that it first appeared where the Chinese laboratory carried out these experiments was located.
By the spring of 2020 it was clear that the SARS-COV-2-Virus Laboratory had improved in Wuhan, China, writes Sir Richard Dearlove
A nurse who wears full PPE in an NHS Covid department. Leading scientists from us and British started shaping the story to support Chinese that the virus had jumped from a bat to people
I was able to ensure that Boris Johnson and Dominic Cummings, his then Staff Chef, received a full briefing in virological and intelligence style in March 2020
By analyzing the virus in January 2020, Birger Sorensen, a brilliant Norwegian virologist, was the first to publicly document the 'Chimere' lab-made nature. That statement is now accepted by the vast majority of Western scientific and government observers.
Leading scientists from the US and British, being aware of the likelihood that the virus was a Chinese laboratory, nevertheless began to shape the story to shape Chinese claims that the virus had jumped from a bat to people.
They also went into the offensive to suppress a serious discussion about the laboratory leking theory. In total 32 leading virologists signed a letter to the medical magazine The Lancet Dubbing that explanation.
The most influential was a paper in natural medicine and claimed that “science has been settled.” It is known as the article 'Proximal Origins'. Sorensen and colleagues wrote an article that demolished proximal origin.
It was refused the publication in Nature Medicine and in every leading scientific journal where it could have been published – without the scientific argument never given before the rejection.
The virological community had closed ranks. Why? Was it to protect itself against accusations of causing the pandemic by the inherent dangers of her research? Does the narrow ties with the Chinese Academy of Sciences (fully under the control of the Chinese Communist Party), whose financing flows through the arteries of worldwide scientific research, may influence its judgment?
Researchers work in a laboratory at the Wuhan Institute of Virology. Leading scientists suppressed any serious discussion about the laboratory leking theory
Boris was convinced by the Labelkargument, but the weight of the government's scientific location prevailed after he had already registered with the Chinese story
Knowing what we knew, I was able to ensure that Boris Johnson and Dominic Cummings, his then Staff Chef, received a full briefing in virological and intelligence style in March 2020. Boris herself was convinced by her argument.
But the weight of the government's scientific establishment, already registered for the Chinese story, prevailed.
It is now clear that the warning was correct.
In retrospect, that refusal to listen to the team of experts with whom I was associated and even to consider that we might have been right-blocked a good debate about the real nature of the SARS-COV-2 virus.
It also partially led to a series of poor policy decisions, perhaps even disastrous.
Nowadays we still live with the consequences.
