JK Rowling seemed to focus on Harry Potter stars Daniel Radcliffe, Emma Watson and Rupert Grint in a social media post shared with its 14.3 million followers.
The 59-year-old author apparently wrote a corrosive answer and indicates the trio in response to the question: “Which actor/actress immediately ruined a film for you?”
Without missing a beat, Rowling wrote Cryptic: 'Three guesses. Sorry, but that was irresistible. '
She ended her post with three smiling emojis.
Many of her followers interpreted her riposte on a large scale as a nod to the three children's stars who played the lead roles in the successful franchise.
The relationships between the Multi -Millionaire author and the actors -who were in the prominent place thanks to the Harry Potter films -have been iron for years because of the views of Rowling about trans -rights.
Last year she publicly stated that Radcliffe and Watson or other celebrities could not 'forgive' that 'the movement of the intention of the heavily fought rights of women' could not have.
The comments were made after the publication of the long-awaited CASS report in gender treatment in the UK, which recommended that changes were made to the way young people are advised and puberty blockers were no longer prescribed.

JK Rowling seemed to focus on Harry Potter stars Daniel Radcliffe, Emma Watson and Rupert Grint in a social media post shared with its 14.3 million followers. Shown: the author with the actors in 2009

Many of the followers of Rowling interpreted her riposte on a large scale as a nod to the three children's stars who played the main roles in the successful franchise
Rowling spent on stars that use their platforms to encourage the transition of minors' and said that people who supported the transition from gender in children must apologize to 'traumatized detansitioners and vulnerable women who are dependent on some sexual rooms'.
The writer is pronounced in her opposition to allow children to change their gender, while Radcliffe and Watson have been pronounced in their support for the trans -community.
After the publication of the CASS report, many people who have expressed doubts about allowing children to be able to transition, claimed that they are justified.
Rowling wrote on X, formerly known as Twitter and at the time said that it was a 'river basin' moment and that 'exposes the tragedy' to allow children to pass.
But when someone claimed that Radcliffe and Watson owe her “a very public apology … Safe in the knowledge that you will forgive them,” Rowling replied by saying, “I am not safe, I fear.”
She added: “Celebrities who have a movement that hid the difficult rights of women and who used their platforms to encourage the transition of minors can save their apologies for traumatized retransitioners and vulnerable women who are dependent on some sexual spaces.”
Rowling later wrote: 'Children are irreversibly damaged and thousands are complicit, not only doctors, but the famous mouthpieces, undisputed media and cynical companies.
'The consequences of this scandal will take place for decades. You welcomed it. You have done everything to hinder and misunderstand research. You tried to bully people out of their jobs because they resist you. Young people are experimented on, left infertile and pain.


Relations between the multi-millionaire author and the actors, including Daniel Radcliffe who played Harry Potter, have been iron for years because of Rowling's views on trans-rights
“I thought the last tweet would be my last, but I just burst into tears. The #cassreview is perhaps a turning point, but it is too late for detansitioners who have written my heartbreaking regret letters.
“Today is not a triumph, it is exposing a tragedy.”
Radcliffe openly spoke about his gap with Rowling and said in an interview last May that his beliefs do not have to adapt to the author, just because she made him a star.
The actor, 34, and colleague Harry Potter -Stars Emma Watson, 34 and Rupert Grint, 35, are pronounced in their support of gender ideology – that biologically male transvrouws are actually women.
But although Radcliffe admitted that 'nothing in my life' would probably have happened as not for Rowling, he said that this did not mean that he was not guilty 'the things he really believes'.
In an interview with the Atlantic, he unveiled that He had not spoken to Rowling for years, which had upset him.
He added: 'Jo, of course Harry Potter would not have happened without her, so nothing in my life would probably have happened as it is without that person.
“But that doesn't mean you owe the things you really believe to someone else for your entire life.”

Last year, Rowling publicly stated that Radcliffe and Watson or other celebrities could not 'forgive' that 'the movement of the intention of the hard -fought of women did not choose'
He added: “It ultimately makes me very sad, because I look at the person I met, the times we met and the books she wrote, and the world she created, and all that is so deeply empathetic to me.”
Watson also openly suggested to the furore with Rowling.
In 2022, Baftas -Gastheer Rebel Wilson invited the actress on stage and said: 'Here to present the next prize, Emma Watson is. She calls herself a feminist, but we all know that she is a witch. '
But when Watson arrived on stage, she said, “I'm here for all the witches!”, In a way that many have interpreted as an open excavation at Rowling.
MailOnline has contacted JK Rowling's management for comment.