Blake Lively’s emotional response after the bomb of Justin Baldoni $ 400 million countersuit had been thrown away
- Advertisement -
Blake LivelyThe emotional response to Justin Baldoni‘s $ 400 million countersuit against her have been rejected.
In December 2024, the actress Baldoni sued because he reportedly had sexually harassed the set – he claims that he denied – before Baldoni and Wayfarer Studios shot back with a defamatory case against Leslie, her publicist Leslie Sloane and husband Reynolds.
Baldoni also entered war with the New York Times and submitted a $ 250 million lawsuit against the publication on the BOM-Tell-All-All on the claims of Livivielied’s sexual harassment against her former CO-star on December 31, 2024.
While the news broke out that a judge Baldoni’s lawsuit against Lively, Reynolds, The New York Times, Sloane and her PR company had rejected, a lively insider said that the star “cried with relief” when she learned about the pronunciation of the bomb.
The source told People From her and husband Ryan Reynolds ‘reactions:’ She is clearly relieved. They are both ‘, adding the entire team of the actress is’ happy’ with the dismissal.
Judge Lewis J Liman has rejected Baldoni’s lawsuit in which is accused and extortion on the basis of the fact that all allegations of Lively were made in privileged lawsuits.
Liman said in the order obtained by DailyMail.com: ‘The Wayfarer parties have not claimed that Lively is responsible for statements other than the statements in her CRD complaint, which are privileged.

Blake Lively’s emotional response to the $ 400 million counter from Justin Baldoni against her fired – she is depicted in their film, it ends with us

In December 2024 the actress Baldoni sued because he reportedly had sexually harassed the set – claimed that he denied – before Baldoni and Wayfarer Studios shot back with a defamatory lawsuit against Leslie, her publicist Leslie Sloane and husband Reynolds – depicted 2023
‘The Wayfarer parties have claimed that Reynolds and [publicist Leslie] Sloane made additional statements that Baldoni accused of sexual misconduct and that the Times made additional statements that the Wayfarer parties accused of entering into a smear campaign.
‘But the Wayfarer parties did not claim that Reynolds, Sloane of the Times would have seriously doubted that these statements were true on the basis of the available information, as required to be liable for defamation under applicable legislation.
‘The additional claims of the Wayfarer parties also fail. Accordingly, the changed complaint must be rejected in its entirety. ‘
The judge ruled: ‘The Times rated the available evidence and reported, perhaps in a dramatized way, what it believed to happen. The Times did not have a clear motive to promote Lively’s version of events. ‘
However, Liman stated that the Wayfarer parties can submit a second changed complaint before 23 June 2025, but can only change the allegations that are “relevant to the claims of unlawful interference and violation of the implicit alliance.”
Dailymail.com has contacted representatives for Justin Baldoni and Wayfarer Studios for comment, but should not hear yet.
Wayfarer Studios was founded by Baldoni and billionaire shopsman Steve Sarowitz in 2019.
A statement obtained by DailyMail.com from the lawyers of Blake Lively read: ‘Today’s opinion is a total victory and a complete justification for Blake Lively, together with those who have dragged Justin Baldoni and the Wayfarer parties their retaliation lawsuit, including Ryan ReynoldsLeslie Sloane and the New York Times.

The drama between lively and Baldoni officially broke out at the end of last year

Lively and her husband Ryan Reynolds, depicted April
‘As we said from the first day, this lawsuit was’ $ 400 million’ a sham, and the court saw straight through it.
“We look forward to the next round, which is looking for lawyers, Treble damage allowance and punitive compensation against Baldoni, Sarowitz, Nathan and the other Wayfarer parties who have committed this insulting lawsuit.”
Liman also weighed the requirements that lively searched for its set ends with us to prevent further discomfort on the set, whereby his opinion stated: ‘Even if they prove to be unnecessary, an employee can insist on protection at the workplace for sexual harassment without being accused of extortion. If an employer accumulates, it cannot later claim that he is the victim of the unlawful threats of the employee. ‘
Moreover, Liman said about the claim that lively the film did not promote unless her cut was released, in addition to other requests: ‘There is also no claim that Lively had a contractual obligation to promote the film; If not, there is no basis to assume that the value she has transferred in terms of her willingness to promote represent something different than a fair trade for the willingness of the Wayfarer parties to use her cut. ‘
The court said that although statements from Reynolds and Sloan were “extreme” or outside the complaint, Baldoni did not claim that they had been made with real malice, or that Reynolds and Sloane knew that their statements were incorrect or in reckless negation of their agility.
The legal battle between Lively and Baldoni officially broke out last year after rumors about tension between the two, in which the actress accused her co-star of sexual harassment and a retaliation campaign, denied allegations Baldoni.
In her lawsuit Lively mentioned a number of Baldoni employees, including his company Wayfarer Studios, the CEO and Financial Backer of the studio, and PR staff Melissa Nathan and Jennifer Abel.
“I hope that my legal action helps to withdraw the curtain about these sinister retaliation actors to harm people who speak of misconduct and help protect others who can be the target,” Lively said the day after she had filed the complaint.
Baldoni has denied the allegations that have denied the accusations of Baldoni by lively, while Lively, Reynolds and Sloane have denied the accusations of Baldoni.
The Baldoni team has released a website that contains private communication, such as SMS messages included in the court applications with details about his interactions with the Hollywood Power pair about making the romantic drama.
He claimed in the court applications that they made efforts to use and undermine his input if its director ends with us.
The Baldoni team said earlier that the communication that was shared on the website on the website makes things clear about the motives of both parties.
The website, which is live on Thelawsuitinfo.com online, comes to the midst of a wave of controversial lawsuits between the employees of the film, which was a hit at the Kassa last August.
Lively submitted an 80 -page complaint about the civil rights to the California Civil Rights Department against Baldoni on December 20, before he officially submitted a federal court case on 31 December.

The Baldoni team has released a website that contains private communication, such as SMS messages included in the court applications with details about his interactions with the Hollywood Power pair about making romantic drama
In her lawsuit, the gossip girl Aluin Baldoni accused her of sexually bothering her in several ways – including the body of the body – and orchestrating a smear campaign against her to damage her reputation.
Baldoni told the court that the trio had made up ‘false accusations of sexual harassment’ against him.
Baldoni and his representatives said in response to the lawsuit that has twisted the meaning of SMS messages alive and misled the audience about their interactions while making the film.
On 3 June, DailyMail.com revealed that Lively, 37, dropped a claim of deliberate and negligent giving up emotional need against Baldoni.

It ends with us, which also played Jenny Slate, Hasan Minhaj, Brandon Sklenar and Kevin McKidd, arrived in theaters on August 9 and was a hit with the audience
Baldoni then sued the newspaper for $ 250 million in a defamation claim about a story of December 21 entitled ‘We Can Bury Elky’: Inside a Hollywood Smear Machine; ‘ The newspaper has denied the allegations.
Since Lively’s complaint was submitted, Baldoni has had a number of professional consequences, including a lawsuit of a former publicist; And are dropped by the agency, which also represents lively and Reynolds.
WME has denied claims that Lively and Reynolds leaned on them to release Baldoni from their customer schedule, according to Variety.
It ends with us, which also played Jenny Slate, Hasan Minhaj, Brandon Sklenar and Kevin McKidd, arrived in theaters on August 9 and was a hit with the public. The film, adapted from the 2016 Colleen Hoover -Roman, earned $ 148 million in domestic cash register and $ 350 million worldwide, according to Box Office Mojo.
Lively broke out with the film from 2005 The Sister Hood of the Travis of the traveling pants opposite Amber Tamblyn, Alexis Bledel and America Ferrera. That led to her controversial role in the TV program Gossip Girl, where she played from 2007-2012, play character Serena van der Woodsen.
She has also been released in films such as The Town, The Town, 2016’s The Shallows, 2018’s A Simple Favor and 2020’s The Rhythm Section.
Before it ends with us, Baldoni was best known for playing the role of Rafael Solano in the TV program Jane The Virgin of 2014-2019. He also directed films, including the five feet of 2019 and the clouds of 2020, and wrote the Book Man Enough 2021, who tackled misconceptions of contemporary masculinity.
- Advertisement -