The Home Office team behind a controversial extremism evaluation had previously claimed that it enjoys classical British sitcoms and great literature works signs of extreme right-wing activities.
The leaked report – which has been concerned about the concern about double police as part of an 'extreme right -wing story' – was produced by civil servants in the research information and communication unit of the Prevention Scheme (Ricu).
It was the same unit that previously caused indignation by choosing TV shows, yes, Premier, the Dick or IT and large British railway trips as possible red flags for extremism.
In 2023, research by Ricu also unveiled books by Shakespeare, Chaucer and Milton under 'important texts' important for 'white nationalists/supremacists'.
Yesterday, Ministers were encouraged to dismiss the staff of the home office in the midst of indignation about the leaked findings of the Counter extremism review, who also claimed that care gangs are a problem that is exploited by the extreme right to generate hatred of Muslims.
It also led to fears for freedom of expression by proposing new 'punitive measures' for online comments that were considered abuse, including a greater police use of non -crime hatred incidents.
Shadow Justice Secretary Robert Jenrick Schoot: 'The officials who have produced this actually incorrect waste are unsuitable for serving the public. They must be fired. '
The Home Office team behind a controversial extremism evaluation had previously claimed that it enjoys classical British sitcoms, including the thick of it, signs of extreme right-wing activities
The leaked report was produced by civil servants within the Research Information and Communications Unit (Ricu) of the Prevent Scheme, which previously said they have pointed out from the Minister of Yes Yes, a possible red flags for extremism
And in the Commons Tory MP Robbie Moore asked: 'Does the minister agree with the language used in the report on care gangs?
“If not, how can he, or the Minister of the Interior, have confidence in the officials of the home office?”
Minister of Security Dan Jarvis drove to avert the report and said: 'Many documents are produced at the government as part of committee work that is not implemented and that do not form a government policy.
'These are not government plans; This is not a government policy. '
Senior Conservative Sir Bernard Jenkin asked him: 'Does that document not show that a great opinion of opinion has completely lost its way about how we deal with extremism and terrorist threats?
'I urge him to encourage the department to return to what is meant to achieve and not being distracted by all this political correctness, given that the majority of the country has no idea what A “non-hate crime incident” is. “
Home Secretary Yvette Cooper – depicted Meeting Police – has rejected the calls in the leaked Home Office report to increase the definition of extremism to record the external left -wing theorists and violent misogynyie
The minister replied: 'We will not leave a stone untouched to ensure that we have the right level of resources in the right place at the right time, so that the always evolving and complex nature of the threat we are confronted with, both in the United Kingdom in the United Kingdom and abroad are tackled by our law enforcement agencies. '
Mr Jarvis said it would be good if the head of the civil service would start a leak investigation to find out how the unpublished report found its way in the hands of policy exchange.
He warned, “If I were the leaker, I would not be too comfortable at the moment.”
But he also stated: “I am actually very proud of the officials in the home office, who work extremely difficult to protect our country against a diverse range of threats every day.”
