Cyclists are confronted with educational courses or fixed fines for ten new violations such as cycling on a road without the necessary care and attention or not using light per night.
The new British laws will try to tackle antisocial bicycles, but the plans would see fines for dangerous bicycles and ignoring school transitions lowered.
According to proposals made by the Home Office, those who violate the new rules could follow an e-learning course of 30 minutes by the National Driver Delideidder Retraining Scheme (NDors) for a £ 100 allowance instead of a fine or points to receive.
Cyclists are currently exempt from following the national speed limit, but they can be continued for dangerous cycling.
However, the changes would ignore school transitions, dangerous bicycles and hitch rides of moving cars that are treated by a more educational approach.
The new violations also relate to to bicycle behavior in the Royal Parks of London Such as Bushy Park, Hyde Park and Regent's Park.
The Home Office report said: 'Such courses are offered as an alternative to an offer of a fixed fine, and therefore a director who successfully completes a course is not obliged to pay a fixed fine with regard to the violation Or to have points endorsed to their driving record.
“The functioning of the NDors enables the police to treat rowing elics at a low level without referring to the courts by offering training courses as an alternative to prosecution.”
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73115/73115cf4402119b7d220084cbf2304840110b82e" alt="Cyclists to face penalties for ten new riding offences – but key dangerous cycling crime is watered down Cyclists to face penalties for ten new riding offences – but key dangerous cycling crime is watered down"
New violations also relate to bicycle behavior in the royal parks of London such as Regent's Park
The Home Office wants to change schedule 3 of the Road Traffic Offender ACT 1988 and the Road Vehicles Lighting Regulations 1989 and Royal Parks and Other Open Spaces Regulations 1997.
This means that there will be fines for ten new violations with regard to dangerous driving.
These include bicycles on a road dangerous, cycling without care and attention, not using lights in the dark, failing to stop at a school crossing patrol, to hold on to a vehicle while moving for a trail, using lamps That causing unnecessary blinding or discomfort for others cycling bicycles in royal parks without following and cycling in a way that endangers others in the royal parks.
Crimes such as bicycles without the necessary care or bicycles on a road are dangerous already violations, but their inclusion means that riders can get an educational course or fine.
Since then there has been a consultation period about the changes to receive 14 answers that have caused a number of problems.
Both the metropolitan police and transport for London have expressed concern about the inclusion of dangerous bicycles.
The report said: 'Three respondents were concerned that the list of offenses in the proposal included both dangerous and careless bicycle violations, which they thought they could create a bad precedent.
“They emphasized that there is already confusion and overlap between these violations and the careless and dangerous driving violations, and wondered whether a road user behavior should be treated as 'dangerous' outside the court.”
In response to the consultation, the government said: 'In response to the feedback received from this consultation, the government has carried out further involvement in NPCC and Ucrud to discuss the concerns that have been expressed, including which offenses are suitable for being added The list of violations for which a NDors course can be offered.
'The above violations cover a series of behaviors that would influence the nature of the presented safety risks (eg the dangerous bicycles could have taken place on an empty road or in a busy area with many other vehicles and pedestrians).
“It is therefore precisely that the police officer has to decide on the right fine, taking into account the circumstances of each case.”
In May last year, campaigners expressed their support for a proposed change in the law, with cyclists who caused death caused by dangerous driving in prison.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/db7ea/db7ea62e83d1e04511478fee83df9713cb75be47" alt="Matt Briggs has been campaigning for stricter prison sentences for almost ten years after his wife Kim (depicted together) was killed by a reckless teenager in East London in 2016"
Matt Briggs has been campaigning for stricter prison sentences for almost ten years after his wife Kim (depicted together) was killed by a reckless teenager in East London in 2016
Matt Briggs was one of those who had been campaigning for stricter prison sentences for almost ten years after his wife Kim, 44, was killed by a reckless teenager in East in 2016 when she crossed the road during her lunch break.
The plan, proposed by Sir Iin Duncan Smith, was then supported by the government to be part of the criminal bill, pending the approval of the House of Lords.
In 2022, a court heard that a cyclist killed an 81-year-old woman after he crashed against her while trying to catch up with her while she walked with a friend along the River Towpath in Oxford.
And in the same year, Brian Fitzgerald did up to 29 km / h in a 20 km / h zone when he hit Hilda Griffiths as she crossed the road with her dog at 7 o'clock in Regent's Park in London.