Who is Harry to give someone about 'weak moral character'?
The clear sweeping of the Duke of Sussex to Donald Trump was completely tin-eared, even for a man of the stupidity and arrogance of the prince.
He made the thin criticism of 'weak moral character' for an audience of 40,000 at the opening of the Invictus games, after the president's statement that Meghan is what many of us believe she is – “she is terrible.”
Why did Harry choose the moment he launched the 2025 matches in Canada to hit back? He should have concentrated on all veterans involved. He was there to celebrate sports heroes who had sustained debilitating injuries, not to send his small vendettas to the world.
Insiders in the games were reportedly angry and upset and the Duke and Duchess of Sussex 'in the spotlights in the games.
That is hardly a surprise. Because this is the kind of behavior we have expected from Harry. Behavior, ironically, that has consistently demonstrated He is The one with a weak moral character.
The grandson of the deceased queen finally left the royal family in a flurry of Pique, so that his admiring grandmother Elizabeth II was plagued by pain and controversy in her last years. He and Megs even accused a part of Granny's family of racist. How despicable can you get?
But it didn't end there. Lead by Meghan, he betrayed not only his grandparents, but also William and Kate, as well as his father and Camilla, with his hateful memoir -reserve and that felaeg -like Oprah interview.
No photo was missed by the couple on the Invictus games, when Meghan rocked her husband's face for a kiss
The consequences of Harry's attacks on his relatives and the crown were so devastating that there was a time when many thought it could herald the end of the monarchy.
What kind of character spoils itself of such a hateful, self -pity, disgusting behavior – except one with weak morality?
Indeed, what kind of moral character has Harry shown at all in recent years at all while he throwing the family name away?
I am sure that it took great moral strength to run to the United States with Meghan to close an £ 80 million deal with Netflix – have not forgotten that Harry has received £ 22 million for reserve – and the royal status he claims to despise! All so that he could and Megs could live in a splendor in a mansion in Montecito worth £ 23.5 million.
He should have opposed the urge to preach the games. Because everything he has done by talking about 'low moral character', the attention draws on him and Megs' gross shortcomings.
It is clear that the sussexes have not given any media or reputation advice for Harry's blow to the president. It is pathetic – like a shrimp that takes on a great white shark.
But then, as Vanity Fair Magazine recently said in a devastating article that has labeled them American Hustlers, this couple will not accept anyone advice. They believe so completely in their own self -righteousness that those who dare to offer a different opinion are shown the door.
Every fool could have told Harry that hiring the American president on a stage to millions worldwide was unwise, to say the least. Every sensible person would have warned the couple not to make everything about himself.
The 'nausea' attempt to be Lovey Dovey and to steal the spotlights of veterans in the games has not made Harry and Meghan many fans
After Donald Trump said about Meghan 'She is terrible', the prince made a thin -veil Jibe with the president about 'weak moral character'
But from the moment that a flowing Duchess of Sussex introduced Harry, it was clear that they had decided to do this exactly.
We had a Fawning Meghan who made Doe Eyes as we looked at him, held his arm and grabbed his face for a very public kiss. No photo-on did not go.
Megs was determined that she and their love affair would last the center stage, whatever we thought about the heroic men and women that this event actually celebrated. In all my many years as a journalist and former political spin doctor, I can't remember any more wrongly calculated and nausea of ​​affection.
Only a man with a layer of moral character would think that the launch of the Invictus games is a suitable platform to grab the agenda for himself and his vorarively ambitious woman.
A senior Invictus Games -volunteer told the mail that Harry's speech was a 'awake' distraction that would not be welcomed by wounded, injured and sick military staff during the event.
Another source emphasized that veterans rejected and explained the attitude of the couple: “In contrast to them, veterans and their families do not see themselves as victims.”
The volunteer added that they 'overshadow the veterans who should be in the middle of all this. This event should be about the veterans, not a royal spectacle … There is a growing frustration about how Harry and Meghan have dominated the story. '
How terrible it is that Harry seems to have to hijack the ceremony in this way.
If he and Meghan can't see how deep inappropriate it was, it's their problem. And one that not only doubts Harry's own character – but whether the couple has a moral compass at all.
