The Trump factor is global politics, one election at the same time – simply not necessarily to the taste of the president.
In large voices in Canada and Australia in the last two weeks, CentralSs saw their fortune revived, while parties that had borrowed from the Maga Playbook lost.
President Trump has been in power for only three months, but his policy, including the imposition of rates and imposing alliances, are bent all over the world in domestic political fights.
Although it is too early to say that anti-Trump forces are on the rise worldwide, it is clear that voters have Mr Trump somewhere in their mind while making decisions.
Political cousins
Canada and Australia share a lot in common: a political system, an important mining industry, a sovereign in King Charles. Now they also share a remarkable political story.
In both countries, before Mr Trump was inaugurated, the Center-Linkse Ruling Parties were ready to lose power in poor condition and seemed. The leaders in polls were the conservative parties, whose leaders flirt with Trumpian politics both in style and in content.
Within a few weeks of the return of Mr Trump, the Canadian and Australian political scenarios turned around in the same way: the center-Link-based operators rose for the conservative oppositions and continued. And the conservative leaders of both countries not only lost the elections – they even lost their own seats in parliament.
The Prime Minister of Canada, Mark Carney, campaigned on an explicit anti-Trump message, so that the threats of the US president were brought into the heart of his campaign in Canada. The leader of Australia, Anthony Albanese, did not. But both men got an anti-Trump bult.
Conservative leaders were confronted with a destructive rejection at the polls. Pierre Poilievre, the head of the Canadian conservatives, and Peter Dutton, the leader of those in Australia, had difficulty shaking off a harmful association with Mr Trump.
Mr Dutton had declined or moderated some Trumpian policy proposals when they were unpopular, such as the workforce of the public sector radically cut off. Mr. Poilievre has never really removed from the Trump approach, even after the US president had threatened the sovereignty of Canada.
Charles Edel, the chairman of Australia at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, a think tank, called the elections in Australia an ‘eruption’. And he suggested that, at least partly, it had led because of Mr Trump’s implicit infringement in the elections, even if it was mainly aimed at domestic issues.
“There were sufficient similarities with the Canadian elections to suggest that the fortunes of the conservatives were when Trump’s rates and attacks on American allies increased,” he wrote in an e -mail.
In Canada, some saw the Australian election result as a sign of solidarity of their cousins in the far south. “Albo up!” An online meme said, who exchanged the nickname of Mr. Albanian in the hockey-inspired anti-Trump slogan of Mr. Carney: “Ellebogen up!”
Flight to safety
Mr Carney benefited from a perception among voters that he would be a stable hand to manage the Lord Trump and his unpredictable impact on the Canadian economy, which is deeply integrated with that of America and all hurts because of rates and uncertainty. His background as an economic policy maker also worked to his advantage.
In Singapore the argument for stability in times of unrest also seemed to help in Singapore helping the action party of established people.
Last month, Prime Minister Lawrence Wong said in parliament that Singapore would retain a greater hit of the new American rates because of the dependence on world trade. He called on Singaporese to brace himself for more shocks and predicted slower growth.
Just like Mr. Carney, who “passed the United States” the old relationship between Canada and the United States, Mr Wong gave a bleak warning for the elections. “The global conditions that make Singapore the success possible in recent decades can no longer be in force,” he said.
On Saturday, voters his party returned to power, An outcome that never doubted, but was still seen as reinforced by the “flight to safety” strategy that the party has deployed.
“This is another case of the Trump effect,” said Cherian George, who wrote books about Singaporean politics. “The feeling of deep concern about Trump’s trade wars is to drive a decisive number of voters to show strong support for the sitting.”
Mixed impact
In Germany, an important Western ally who was the first to hold a national election after Mr Trump’s inauguration, the effect of the Trump factor is less direct, but it is still felt.
Friedrich Merz, who will be sworn in on Tuesday as the new Chancellor of Germany, did not benefit politically from Mr. Trump’s elections such as leaders in Canada or Australia in the more recent votes.
But if Mr. Trump’s confrontation with the European allies of America about Defense and Trade did not help Mr. Merz before the vote, it has helped him since.
Mr. Merz was able to go through a suspension of expenditure limits in tax austere Germany, which will make his work as a Chancellor easier. He did this by claiming that the old certainties about the American dedication to mutual defense had disappeared.
“Do you seriously believe that an American government agrees to continue NATO as before?” He early legislators In March.
The embrace of the Maga-Sphere of an extreme right-wing German party that is known as the AfD did not help it, although Elon Musk had gone so far to endorse the party and to appear at one of his events per video stream.
A British exception
An unpredictable US president can have unpredictable consequences for leaders abroad, because Prime Minister Keir Starmer of Great Britain quickly discovers.
Mr. Starmer, a leader in the center-left who won his election before Mr. Trump won his, Initially received praise For the business way in which he treated the new American president.
In contrast to Mr. Carney did his best to prevent direct criticism of Mr Trump, where possible to find a common cause with him and to turn a break. After a visit to the White House that was considered successful, even some political opponents of Mr. Starmer impressed.
All this time, a Trump all-way-fellow in Great Britain, Nigel Farage, leader of the reform of the anti-immigration parties UK, struggled to ward off accusations that he is sympathetic with President Vladimir V. Putin van Russia.
But Mr. Starmer soon no longer hit steam after he had failed to parlay a pleasant visit from the White House in exemptions from American rates on British goods.
His Labor party was treated last week an important blow When the vote took place in regional and other elections in parts of England. It lost 187 council seats and a special parliamentary elections in one of his strongholds.
Mr Farage’s party, on the other hand scored a spectacular successNot only winning those special elections, but taking two mayors and making a major win. For the first time, his party won control of the lowest government levels in different parts of the country.
Victoria Kim contributed report from Sydney; Sui-lee woe from Singapore; Christopher F. Schuetze from Berlin; And Stephen Castle From London.
- Advertisement -