Blake Lively makes a shock movement and falls the deliberate accompanying emotional need ‘Claim against Justin Baldoni

Blake Lively has dropped her claim that Justin Baldoni deliberately caused her emotional need, after his legal team demanded medical evidence.

A new court application, exclusively obtained by DailyMail.com, shows that the controversial actress has also withdrawn a second claim from negligent encounter of emotional need and tries to prevent her health files from sharing with the legal team of the 41-year-old.

But there was an angel in the story for Baldoni – who now has two fewer claims to defend himself – after the actress demanded the claims to fall without prejudices, which means that they could be filled again.

The attempt has put forward a new round of legal letters, where the Baldoni team is angry that the mother of Vier tries to ‘have both sides’ and demand that she meets their ‘reasonable’ request to see her medical documents.

An insider told DailyMail.com that Lively Lively had hoped to dump the emotional emergency elements of the lawsuit quietly to avoid having her records examined.

Lively had claimed that the emotional need is said to have inflicted her by Baldoni, ‘had seriously influenced her physical, psychological and emotional well -being – all of whom could appear in her health files.

The Lively team has responded to the request from DailyMail.com to comment: ‘Again, this is a routine part of the process process that is used as a press stunt. We do what process lawyers do: prepare our case for the process by streamlining and concentrating it; They do what they do: desperately looking for a different tired round of tabloeding.

‘Madam. Lively continues to claim emotional need, as part of many other claims in her court case, such as sexual harassment and retribution, and massive extra compensatory damage to all its claims. ‘

Although the actress has now dropped the emotional emergency claims, Baldoni will still have to defend herself about her other claims, including sexual harassment and the orchestration of a smear campaign against her.

The 41-year-old also strives for its own $ 400 million counters that also claims accusation and accuses the glamorous blonde of damaging his reputation and career.

The withdrawal is the newest turn in a tsunami of legal developments that in recent weeks has seen the warring couple to fight it about his attempt to summon her one -off bestie, Taylor Swift.

Swift, 36, was dragged to the Saga in January because of a now -noted claim from Baldoni who referred live to the Megastar and husband Ryan Reynolds, 48, as ‘my dragons’ and threatened to unleash them on him refused to go along with her changes in a scene.

According to a legal letter that was sent together with the summons, Lively has reported to leak a decade of text messages if Swift would not give an explanation to support her.

The Lively team quickly hit back and denied the claims, and also demanded that the summons were withdrawn – a request that was later granted by Judge Lewis Liman.

Subpoenas against lively and Reynolds were maintained and the actress is confronted with a statement, although that too is the subject of quarrels because of her reluctance to be grilled by Baldoni’s lawyers.

Dropping the emotional emergency claims is another legal setback for the 37-year-old actress, who has been the subject of a flood of negative headlines for months and her friendship with Swift publicly deteriorates.

Moreover, some of her allegations started to look increasingly dubious, including the claim that Baldoni had thought her neck and told her ‘You smell so good’ during a dance scene.

Although Lively claimed that it was filmed with microphones, DailyMail.com obtained unprocessed images that showed that it was on and that the conversation was about the scent of Lively’s fake brown instead.

She has also confronted with control over some of the legal maneuvers of her team, including a Shell -Rights shop that was used in October as the basis for getting publicist Stephanie Jones for a telephone used by her former employee Jennifer Abel.

The messages on the phone between Abel and Crisis PR Melissa Nathan were later used as the basis for the claims of Lively of a smear campaign, although the Baldoni team returned that the texts were selectively edited and the conversations were completely published.

Jones had strongly refused to hand over the texts as a favor and to argue in the court papers that she only reversed the device after receiving a summons last October.

But that led to the existence of an ‘appearance’ right case being unveiled-a case of a drunk case submitted by Lival’s Company Vanzan against Anonymous Dos 1-10.

The revelation led to a furious response from Baldoni’s lawyer Bryan Freedman who described the Vanzan right case as a ‘false display’.

‘Madam. The company of Lively’s and Mr. Reynolds Vanzan had nothing to do with this case and they knew it, “Freedman said in a statement.

‘This apparent procedure was designed to obtain a summons without supervision or control, and thus denied my customers the opportunity to dispute the decency, nature and scope of the summons.

“There is nothing normal about this. Officers of the court have a frank duty in court and the obligation not to submit fictional lawsuits that in fact have no basis or rights.

“This was done in bad faith and is a flagrant abuse of process.”

Dailymail.com has also revealed that Baldoni has added a powerful female procedure to his legal adviser who could make a ‘meaningful difference’ with his bitter battle with LivelyAccording to insiders – and she has an unlikely connection with Taylor Swift.

Ellyn S. Garofalo, who previously Worked with Venable LLP – the law firm used by Swift – has become a member of Baldoni as part of the Wayfarer’s legal team in a movement that fans encouraged to question the singer’s involvement in the current war.

The Pop -Superster, 35, was dragged in the feud between Lively, 37, and her ends with our Costar and director Baldoni, 41, early May when she was official subpoena as a witness.

A legal letter submitted by his lawyers last month claimed that Lively had tried to ‘force’ Swift to give a public statement to support her and urged her to remove SMS messages between them.

Lively’s lawyers later submitted a motion and asked the court to touch the accusations of his docket as ‘unfounded, unnecessary, incorrect and offensive’ and the motion of Lively to reject Baldoni’s letter was granted.

But the Baldoni team withdrew the summons at the end of May after Venable LLP objected that it came down to an ‘unjustified fish expedition’. It was branded ‘tabloid clickbait’ by the representative of Swift.

Garofalo, who worked at Venable LLP from 2018 to 2021, reportedly came to Baldoni’s team “After Venable was able to throw the Taylor recipient.”

“Because Ellyn to become a member of the counsel is huge,” an insider told the Daily Mail exclusively.

According to her biography, Garofalo is a seasoned process lawyer with more than three decades of court experience.

Her focus is on ‘civil, criminal and regulatory matters, including sec maintaining actions’, and she has previously worked on high-profile matters with Anna Nicole Smith and Alyssa Milano.

“The Baldoni team is enthusiastic because of her track record in the courtroom,” said the insider about the Pepperdine Law School Grad.

“She not only brings exceptional legal expertise, but also fulfills their desire to record a prominent female procedure.”

The news about her involvement comes days after a public insider in Swift’s inner circle would have reported documented evidence to the main lawyer of Baldoni, Bryan Freedman, which described how Lively’s lawyers ‘threatened’ the private changes of the actress to leak with Swift forcing the singer in the audience to choose her against Baldoni. The Daily Mail exclusively revealed that the ‘Leaker’ was none other than Scott Swift-de 73-year-old father of the singer.

“Garofalo was forced to participate in the case after revising his circumstances, and felt strong that an injustice unfolded and that her participation could make a meaningful difference,” our source said.

The legal dispute Then started vibrant Baldoni for sexual harassment. Baldoni has resisted defamation. Both parties have denied all allegations against them. Their process is planned for March 2026.