Blake Lively’s next step in Justin Baldoni Legal War … and it’s former BFF Taylor Swift

Blake Lively changes her sights on her former friend Taylor Swift If her lawsuit against sexual harassment against Justin Baldoni drags on.

The 37-year-old Gossip Girl-star now asks the judge who supervises her case for a protective order to prevent Baldoni’s lawyer from striving for their ‘continuous demands’ for Lively with Swift, according to documents obtained by the Daily Mail.

In a letter from Lively lawyers who was submitted on Friday, they accused Baldoni – whose $ 400 million slander suit Against Lively, her husband Ryan Reynoldsher publicist and the New York Times was rejected – of having ‘refused to produce to Mrs. Lively The documents they claimed to have publicly received as part of a deal to withdraw their summons from Mrs. Swift and her advice. ‘

Lively’s lawyer Esra Hudson insisted on the protective order by saying that it had been a ‘tactic’ of Baldoni to make Mrs. Swift and her fan base central in their media strategy against Mrs. Lively. ‘

Representatives of Swift and Baldoni did not immediately respond to DailyMail.com for comment.

The letter was submitted only a few days after social media accounts that have regularly claimed pro-baldoni updates Swift, 35, had recently removed Instagram messages with lively.

Blake Lively asks a judge for a protective order to prevent the legal team from Justin Baldoni from had the communication she had with her former friend Taylor Swift, according to a letter submitted on Friday and obtained by DailyMail.com; Displayed on June 9 in NYC

Lively the lawyers accused Baldoni ‘to refused to produce Mrs. Lively the documents they claimed to have received publicly as part of a deal to withdraw their summons from Mrs. Swift and her advice’; Swift was shown in LA in February

The last development comes days after the defamation of $ 400 million from Baldoni against Lively was rejected; Shown in December 2024 in LA

The fans of the pop singer, however, quickly close the discussion by pointing out that the relevant messages were removed for years before she reported that she was shining with Lively as part of an album promotional for the 2017 reputation.

The Lively lawyers added that she ‘respectfully asks that she will be relieved of producing documents that respond to’ requests from 41-year-old Jane the Virgin Star for all her communication with Swift.

A spokesperson for Lively said that “Justin Baldoni and the Wayfarer parties are still demanding access to the private communication of Taylor Swift – even though they have already been summoned and subsequently withdrew that summons after they” had everything they needed. “

‘As reflected in today’s submission, their intention to drag Taylor Swift in this was clearly already in August 2024, when the crisis PR company led by Melissa Nathan included her in their’ Scenario -Planning ‘document (lively changed complaint, exhibition D) and the’ ts fanbase ‘(lively’ to take something, ” “Did you write.

‘The constant attempts to try again to use the largest star in the world as a PR tactic in this matter, reflect a public unraveling of epic proportions – and only serves to deduce that the lawsuits of Justin Baldoni against Mrs. Lively, Ryan Reynolds, their publicist and their publicist and their publicist and their publicist and their publicist’ ”

Earlier this week Lively served one summons of a figure connected to Swift: Her Nemesis scooter Braun.

Both Braun and his K-Pop Corporation Hybe were summoned as well as the Lively team of Lively Looking for Documents with regard to crisis PR manager Melissa Nathan Die was mentioned in Lively’s Bombshell Suit against Baldoni-E-ENTER INFORMATION she did for Baldoni.

Braun bought the early Master -taking recordings of Taylor Swift after she claimed that her former label had refused to sell them to her.

Baldoni had also sued Lively’s husband Ryan Reynolds (depicted with her in April in NYC), as well as her publicist and the New York Times. He still has the option to make four of his seven original claims again

Lively’s lawyer Esra Hudson defended the request to say the protective order by saying that it had been a ‘tactic’ of Baldoni to make Mrs. Swift and her fan base central in their media strategy against Mrs. Lively ‘

Blake and Taylor have often appeared in each other’s social media messages, as shown above

But in the comments, Swifties noted that Taylor had wiped out her Instagram and other social media accounts in August 2017 – after the photos were posted – as PR aggregation to announce the release of her reputation album (photo).

The Shake It Off Singer’s Fury led her to launch her ‘Taylor’s Version’ series ‘series’ of re -recorded albums to overhaul with recording royalties of the new owners of her masters who could have received the new owners.

The Saga, however, ended at the end of May when Swift was finally able to buy back the recordings for an unknown sum.

Swift has since shared that she had re -recorded her titllless debut album, and she suggested that it could be released somewhere in the future in her letter in which she announced her purchase of her masters.

However, she disappointed a lot of her fans by also admitting that she had not yet finished re -establishing her 2017 album reputation, which Swifties has called in recent months.

Although she debuted with a re -admitted version of the single look of the album that you did in a recent episode of The Handmaid’s Tale, it is unclear when she will pick up the album again, or if she even plans to complete the project.

She admitted that she could slowly control the process in her letter because the reputation was “so specific for that time in my life.”

“To be honest, it’s the only album in the first six that I thought could not be improved by doing it again … so I kept postponing it,” she wrote.