Candace Owens calls Blake Lively on the claim that she is being summoned in Justin Baldoni Legal Drama

Conservative Candace Owens has hit back on claims that she has become the newest star Blake Lively and Justin Baldoni’s Legal Drama.

While Baldoni, 41, his next move weeks after his $ 400 million counter against Lively, 37, was rejected, a report arose, claiming that Owens, 35, was ordered to reverse communication with the actor and the Wayfarer parties.

In addition to Owens – who has often discussed the IT Ends with our legal fight on her podcast – it was claimed that media personality Perez Hilton and YouTuber Andy Signore had also been summoned after making waves with their ‘Blake Bashing Commentary’.

However, Owens has fired back on Lively, denied that he has received a summons and has accused a simple favor of the star of a simple favor of ‘leaks’ the story TMZ.

She told DailyMail.com exclusively in a statement: ‘Given that I have not yet received a summons, I appreciate Blake’s team that this is leaking to TMZ to warn me about it.

‘And of course I don’t have the least idea I am being summoned for, because I knew none of these parties when their respective lawsuits were filed. But stay informed, and I let the audience know on my podcast! ‘

Dailymail.com has contacted representatives for Hilton, Lively and Baldoni for comment and has not yet returned.

Popcorned Planet -Gastheer Signore claimed memorable that Lively was ‘the defeat in a sneaky way’ after she had dropped her emotional emergency claim against Baldoni last month.

Last month the theater of the battle between Lively And Baldoni Limited with the announcement that he will not change the claims in his $ 400 million convenient procedure.

His lawyer Bryan Freedman announced that None of his complaints in the discarded lawsuit would change none of his complaints.

In a statement to DailyMail.com Freedman said: ‘The court’s decision about the motion to dismiss has no effect on the truth that there was no intimidation or any smear campaign, and it does not affect our powerful defense against Mrs Lively.

“The discovery continues and we are convinced that we will prevail against these actually unfounded accusations,” he continued. “Instead of revising the existing claims, our customers will pursue extra legal options that are available to us.”

Despite her first legal victory when Baldoni’s lawsuit was rejected, Lively did not relieve her own lawsuit, She recently sent a whole series of new subpoenas.

A spokesperson for Lively also responded to the news that Baldoni returned to his failed attempt to take care of her in a statement to Dailymail.com.

“The court rejected the frivolous $ 400 million Baldoni -Wayfarer in its entirety,” they said.

“In the days that followed, Baldoni’s lawyer said that the judge’s decision to reject their case was no problem because they promised to change it and restore it. As usual, that was not true, “her spokesperson continued. “The resignation of the court of Baldoni’s false procedure was a total victory.”

Judge Lewis J. Liman rejected Baldoni’s lawsuit, but he left De Jane the Virgin Star a second opportunity to change the case by 23 June.

However, the judge ruled that he could only change the relevant of the allegations of the claims of torturing interference in the contract and violation of the implicit alliance. ‘

The opinion of 132 pages broke out why the allegations in the court case of Baldoni were without merit, including the accusation that Lively, her husband and her publicist Leslie Sloane held in ‘civil extortion’.

A statement obtained at the time by DailyMail.com from the lawyers of Blake Lively read: ‘Today’s opinion is a total victory and a complete justification for Blake Lively, along with that Justin Baldoni and the Wayfarer parties in their retaliation lawsuit, including, including, including inclusive Ryan ReynoldsLeslie Sloane and the New York Times.

‘As we said from the first day, this lawsuit was’ $ 400 million’ a sham, and the court saw straight through it.

“We look forward to the next round, which is looking for lawyers, Treble damage allowance and punitive compensation against Baldoni, Sarowitz, Nathan and the other Wayfarer parties who have committed this insulting lawsuit.”

In a statement obtained by DailyMail.com, a New York Times spokesperson said about the dismissal: ‘We are grateful to the court for seeing the lawsuit against the New York Times for what it was: a deserving attempt to suppress fair reporting.

‘Our journalists went out and treated a clear story of public interest carefully and reasonably, and the court acknowledged that the law was designed to protect exactly that kind of journalism. We will continue to rise before the court for our journalism and for our journalists when their work is attacked. ‘

The legal battle between lively and Baldoni officially broke out last year after rumors about tension between the two, with the actress accusing her co-star of sexual harassment and one retaliation campaignAccusations Baldoni denied.

In her lawsuit Lively mentioned a number of Baldoni employees, including his company Wayfarer Studios, the CEO and Financial Backer of the studio, and PR staff Melissa Nathan and Jennifer Abel.

Baldoni has denied the allegations that have denied the accusations of Baldoni by lively, while Lively, Reynolds and Sloane have denied the accusations of Baldoni.

The Baldoni team has released a website that contains private communication, such as SMS messages included in the court applications with details about his interactions with the Hollywood Power pair about making the romantic drama.

He claimed in the court applications that they made efforts to use and undermine his input if its director ends with us.

The Baldoni team said earlier that the communication that was shared on the website on the website makes things clear about the motives of both parties.

The website, which is live on Thelawsuitinfo.com online, comes to the midst of a wave of controversial lawsuits between the employees of the film, which was a hit at the Kassa last August.

Lively submitted an 80 -page complaint about the civil rights to the California Civil Rights Department against Baldoni on December 20, before he officially submitted a federal court case on 31 December.

In her lawsuit, the gossip girl alum balkdoni accused her of sexual harassment of her in several ways – including body that she scoops up – and orchestrate a smear campaign against her To damage her reputation.

Baldoni told the court that the trio had made up ‘false accusations of sexual harassment’ against him.

Baldoni and his representatives said in response to the lawsuit that has twisted the meaning of SMS messages alive and misled the audience about their interactions while making the film.

Dailymail.com revealed vividly on 3 June a claim of deliberate and negligent accumulation of emotional need Against Baldoni.

Baldoni then sued the newspaper for $ 250 million in a defamation claim about a story of December 21 entitled ‘We Can Bury Elky’: Inside a Hollywood Smear Machine; ‘ The newspaper has denied the allegations.

Since Lively’s complaint was submitted, Baldoni has had a number of professional consequences, including a lawsuit of a former publicist; and be Flood through the WME agency, which also repeats lively and Reynolds.

WME has denied claims that Lively and Reynolds leaned on them to release Baldoni from their customer schedule, according to Variety.