Fashion Guru is caught by eagle with eagle in ‘shocking schedule’ that her fans have furiously left behind: ‘bag with lies’

A popular fashion -guru is brightly beaten about claims that she is buying clothing items for cheap abroad and then sells her loyal fans with a huge marketup.

The fashion brand PARKE seemed to take over Tap And Instagram in recent months, with Gen Z who fights to get his products in his hands every time the new items drop.

Made by the well -known influencer Chelsea Kramer, the company is best known for its sweaters that have etched the word parke about them, denim tops and shorts, and comfortable loungewear, among other things.

But the articles come for a steep price – for example, one denim skirt costs $ 170, while their airy pajama pants are no less than $ 100.

Yet it cannot be denied that the brand has become a huge feeling since it started less than two years ago – and Chelsea recently demonstrated that the company has yielded no less than $ 16 million.

But Tiktok’s favorite new clothing company was recently dressed in controversy after a woman claimed that she discovered a shocking secret about Parke.

The woman, who goes online sustainable fashion friend, claimed in two Nu-Viral videos that she found proof that the Chelsea brand is buying his items of clothing from a Chinese supplier known as Alibaba for a low price, and then resells much higher for the dedicated fans.

A representative for the brand has denied and explains her claims on DailyMail.com: “As we discussed in recent interviews, we refuse all these claims.”

In one of the clips, which was shared last month, sustainable fashion friend said she thought it would be ‘fairly simple’ to find out where Park’s clothing was made, because it is a brand that is proud of ‘transparency’.

“But if you go to the PARKE website, you won’t see where the clothes were made,” she said.

‘They will not even say whether it is imported or even the country where it came from. And if you visit her LLC and import records, nothing will come up. ‘

She said she decided to go to ‘private research mode’ and searched for clues in Chelsea’s Tiktok videos; Chelsea often documents her daily efforts while running the brand on the platform.

Sustainable Fashion Friend said she noticed an address that was written on a document in one of the Chelsea clips that lead her to Qingdao Gu Ang Industry and Trading Co., a manufacturer who sells items in bulk on a website called Alibaba.

In another video from Chelsea, she said she found a piece of clothing with a tag that seemed to have the Alibaba website.

She also claimed that Chelsea showed her computer screen at some point and she had opened several Alibaba tabs.

“If you don’t know what Alibaba is, it is a website that you can use to get in touch with clothing manufacturers and in fact start your own modeline without doing the production itself,” sustainable fashion friend continued.

She also claimed that she found clothing items on the Qingdao Gu Ang Industry and the Alibaba page of Trading Co. Who look extremely comparable when they are for sale on Parke – but for a much lower price.

“You can find something very bad on this on the Alibaba page of that supplier, and look at the prices,” said sustainable fashion friend, showing out with Parke’s $ 110 boyfriend Knopop.

She then showed a screenshot of an extremely comparable top for sale at Alibaba for $ 9 if you buy it in bulk.

Moreover, she claimed to have found pants that is comparable to Parke’s striped boxer pants (which cost $ 100 on the Park site) for $ 9.

She also pointed out that a denim shirt with long sleeves of Parke costs $ 175, but one that looks almost exactly the same thing, is for sale on Alibaba for around $ 6 if you buy 5,000 pieces or more.

In the end, sustainable fashion friend said she is trying to make people aware of what she claimed is a huge pattern that happens behind the scenes.

‘Many brands and influencers tell you [a story]They sell you the feeling that you fit in, but don’t let their drops make you think that it is so exclusive, “she concluded.

She added the caption: ‘If [Chelsea] Really took care of the brand and what it stands for, she would show the entire process. The factory. The employees. Their names. The wage. The conditions.

‘But instead we get color palettes and are confronted with ice routines because it fits better with aesthetics.

‘Many influencer brands/brands generally sell stories instead of real quality and transparency.

‘They will call something sustainable, deliberately or unique if it is really a hoodie of $ 15 from a factory that they will never call, nor visit and deny when they are connected to it.

‘Don’t let Branding mislead you by thinking that something more ethical, more exclusive, more sincere or more valuable than it actually is.

‘All shared observations are based on publicly available information and my personal opinion as a researcher of sustainability.

“These are not definitive claims about individual or business practices, but rather comments based on visual agreements and open-source data.”

During a chat with The cut Chelsea has recently vague tackled the video of sustainable fashion friend.

The publication said that Chelsea claimed: “Parke is not labeled white and that she works with a technical designer to design monsters that go through different rounds of changes in fit, wash and color.”

But they added that she said that “she will not respond publicly to the videos about her process.”

Chelsea stated: “If something is still not true, I have the feeling that it is paying attention, will just make something worse.”

The videos of sustainable fashion friend have resulted in a huge recoil for the brand, because many viewers hurried to the commentary section to hit it.

“Disgusting,” wrote an indignant user. Another added: ‘I am so sick of the sustainable lies.

‘Stop selling re -packaged cheap clothing. This is precisely the reason why I never buy anything new and 90 percent of my clothes are gained. ‘

“Influencers who light up followers … what’s new,” someone else destroyed.

“Not Alibaba. Learn to learn about new brands that I will never support here, “read a fourth comment.

A fifth said: ‘I am a fashion designer, for eight years, went to school for my diploma and such.

‘Now I spend my time at work Spoon Feeding Design Ideas on influencers who call themselves’ designers’ about brand collaborations.

“Influencers claim that they have worked hard to make this collaboration, but it is really a team of designers who do all the work and then only receive approval from the influencer for the styles and colorways that we offer them.”

“American seamstress here … I made clothing by hand for 20 years from start to end of 20 years,” another user shared.

‘That includes making the design, drawing up pattern, purchasing materials, cutting and sewing … and in general sewing longer than I can remember.

‘It frustrates me to the high sky when new brands claim things that are simply not true are transparent about sourcing.

“I can’t stand it when pre -produced items of clothing are passed on as something original and then mark it 300 percent as the quality is worth so much.”