Table of Contents
Scientists unveiled the 2025 update for the 'Doomsday Clock' on Tuesday and revealed that the clock in 2024 came a second closer to midnight.
The symbolic clock, which comes closer to midnight to reflect global catastrophes made by humans, is now at 89 seconds to midnight.
The bulletin of atomic scientists, who decides where the hands were set, called the Russia-Ukraine war, the constant conflicts of Israel in the Middle East, the threat of nuclear war, climate change, a popping bird flu pandemic and progress in 'disruptive' Technologies such as AI.
“This is closest to the world was once until midnight,” the experts said. In other words, closest to the catastrophic end of humanity.
Speakers at the event were Nobel Price winner Juan Manuel Santos and Daniel Holz, board member and physicist at the University of Chicago.
“We have placed the clock closer to midnight because we see insufficient positive progress in the worldwide challenges that we are confronted with,” said Holz.
“Setting the Doomsday clock at 89 seconds to midnight is a warning for all world leaders,” he added.
Since 2023 it has been set at 90 seconds to midnight, but this year scientists say that it can be ahead of reflecting the disturbing global prospects.
Scientists today unveiled the 2025 update for the 'Doomsday Clock' and revealed that the clock in 2024 came a second closer to midnight
What does the 2025 update mean for humanity?
The Doomsday Clock was set up at 90 seconds until midnight last year. Moving a second closer means that in 2024 humanity made insufficient progress in tackling important global threats.
“The factors that form this year's decision – nuclear risk, climate change, the potential abuse of progress in biological science and a variety of other emerging technologies such as artificial intelligence – were not new in 2024,” Holz said.
“But we have seen insufficient progress when tackling the most important challenges, and in many cases this leads to constantly negative and worrying effects,” he added.
The 2022 infringement of Russia in Ukraine launched the bloodiest conflict of Europe since the Second World War.
'The war in Ukraine continues to loom as a major source of nuclear risk. That conflict could escalate to record nuclear weapons at any time due to a result decision or by accident and miscalculation, “said Holz.
Russian President Vladimir Putin lowered the threshold for a nuclear attack in November in response to a broader range of conventional attacks, a movement that described the Kremlin as a signal in the West.
The updated doctrine of Russia has established a framework for the circumstances under which Putin could order a strike at the world's largest nuclear arsenal.
The Middle East has been another source of instability with the Israel-Gaza war and broader regional hostilities with countries such as Iran.
An Israeli attack on Al-Hudari Family House reduces the building into a rubble in Gaza City, Gaza on January 5, 2025
According to scientists, this month were moving fires in California due to climate change. Shown, a house is flooded in Flames, Los Angeles, January 8, 2025
President Donald Trump spoke in the Roosevelt room of the White House, flanked by Masayoshi son, chairman and CEO of Softbank Group Corp; Larry Ellison, Executive Charmain Oracle and Sam Altman, CEO of Open AI on January 21, 2025, to announce $ 500b AI investment.
“We look carefully and hope it ceases -fires in Gaza will hold,” said Holz.
In the meantime, nuclear armed China has staged the military pressure near Taiwan, and North Korea, nuclear armed North Korea continues with tests from various ballistic missiles.
Climate change is a different existential threat. Last year was the hottest in the recorded history, according to scientists from the UN World Meteorological Organization. The last 10 years were the 10 hottest ever, it said.
“Although there has been an impressive growth in wind and solar energy, the world is still falling short of what is needed to prevent the worse aspects of climate change,” said Holz.
Last year also saw stunning progress in artificial intelligence, which led to increasing concern for some experts about his military applications and its risks to global safety.
Governments have tackled the issue in attacks and starts. In the US, the then President Biden then signed an executive order that was intended to reduce the risks that AI forms for national security, economy and public health or safety.
His successor Donald Trump withdrew it last week and also announced an investment of $ 500 billion in the private sector in AI infrastructure.
“Progress in AI is starting to appear on provisional but worrying ways on the battlefield, and of particular importance is the future possibility of AI applications for nuclear weapons,” said Holz.
'Moreover, AI is increasingly disrupting the world's information ecosystem. AI-driven disinformation and wrong information will only contribute to this dysfunction. '
What is the day -day clock?
In 2024, the hands did not move to display an unchanging global situation
The Doomsday Clock is a symbolic timepiece that shows how close the world is to a global catastrophe made by humans, as considered by experts.
Every year the clock is updated on the basis of how close to the total destruction of humanity ('midnight').
If the clock goes ahead and comes closer to midnight (compared to where it was set the previous year), this suggests that humanity has come closer to self -destruction.
But if it goes back, further away from midnight, this suggests that humanity has reduced the risks of global catastrophe in the past 12 months.
In a few years, such as 2024, the hands of the clock have not been moved at all – which suggests that the global situation has not changed.
The clock is determined by the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, a non -profit organization based in Chicago that publishes an academic magazine.
Although symbolic and not a real clock, the organization reveals a physical 'quarter clock' model at an event when revealing whether the hands have been moved.
After the unveiling, the model can be found in the Bulletin offices in the Keller Center, the home of the University of Chicago Harris School of Public Policy.
Every January the bulletin of atomary scientists reveals its annual update of the Doomsday Clock – even if the hands are not moved.
When was the Doomsday clock made?
The Doomsday Clock goes back to June 1947, when the American artist Martyl was hired to design a new cover for the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists Journal.
With a striking image on the cover, the organization hoped to scare men in rationality, according to Eugene Rabinowitch, the first editor of the magazine.
It came in the midst of a background of public fear of atomic warfare and weapons, just two years after the Second World War.
Langdorf initially considered pulling the symbol for uranium before he outlined a clock to convey a sense of urgency.
The Doomsday Clock goes back to June 1947, when the American artist Martyl was hired to design a new cover for the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists Journal
Dr. Leonard Rieser, chairman of the Bulletin board of the Atomic Scientists, moves the hand of the Doomsday Clock back to 17 minutes before midnight in the vicinity of the University of Chicago on November 26, 1991
She put it for seven minutes to midnight because “it looked good before my eye,” Langdorf said later.
The hands of the clock were adapted to the coverage of later expenses in the following years based on how close we are with Catastrophe.
After the Soviet Union successfully tested its first atomic bomb in 1949, Rabinowitch reset the clock from seven minutes to midnight to three minutes to midnight.
Since then it has continued to move forward and declining.
In 2009 the Bulletin stopped its printed edition, but the clock is updated once a year on its website and is now a long -awaited highlight of the scientific calendar.
Who decides what time to set the Doomsday Clock?
Shortly after it was first made, Bulletin editor Eugene Rabinowitch decided whether or not to be moved.
Rabinowitch was a scientist, fluent Russian, and a leader in the conversations about nuclear disarmament, which means that he was in frequent discussions with scientists and experts around the world.
After he had considered the discussions, he would decide whether the clock should be moved forward or backwards, at least in the first decades of the clock existence.
When he died in 1973, the Bulletin's Science and Security Board took over, consisting of experts in the field of nuclear technology and climate science, and has recorded 13 Nobel Prize winners over the years.
The panel meets twice a year to discuss current world events, such as the war in Ukraine, and whether a clock change is needed.
When were the hands furthest away from midnight?
In 1991, after the end of the Cold War, the Bulletin put the clocks in its hands at 17 minutes to midnight.
The end of the war saw the US and the Soviet Union sign the strategic arms reduction treaty.
This meant that the countries would reduce their nuclear weapons, which would reduce the threat of Nuclear War.
Unfortunately, the hands have not been that far away since then from midnight – and they don't look quickly when going back to this position.
