Justin Baldoni has submitted a changed version of his $ 400 million defamation suit that accuses Blake Lively of it to give the New York Times Advance access to her complaint about sexual harassment – after a stunning DailyMail.com – Department.
The alleged main start gave the staff members of the Gray Lady the time to set up an article of 4,000 words with photos, images and fragments from the explosive submission that was lively presented to the California Civil Rights Department on December 20.
The #MeToo Style Takedown – entitled 'We Can Bury Elky': Inside a Hollywood Smear Machine – was published the next day as an important exclusive details about how the gossip girl Aluin was hit with a negative PR -Blitz when she complained about Baldoni's on – Set behavior.
But – as DailyMail.com reported – The online version of the story also contained buried instructions in his metadata that suggested that the reporters of the outlet had worked on it for much longer than a day.
These contain a compound page 'Topper' image of the IT Ends with us Co-Stars that had embedded the date '2024-12-16' in its code.
Our discovery was just the tip of the iceberg, according to a changed complaint that was submitted at the end of Friday by the Baldoni team, which says they have the evidence that the times were already starting to work on the scoop in October.
Justin Baldoni has submitted a changed version of his $ 400 million defamation suit that accuses Blake Lively of it to give the New York Times Advance access to her complaint about sexual harassment – after a stunning DailyMail.com – Displating; Seen in December 2024
A technical function that is first spotted by Speurneuzen on the internet and described as a 'Message-Embed generator' can be found in the source code of the article with the date '2024-10-31', according to the submission.
The finding made many convinced that the outlet and lively was planning 'for him a few months' before she let her bomb complaint against him just five days before Christmas.
'It may of course be the case that the New York Times happens to be loading a new tool for the inclusion of SMS messages in an article as part of routine systemupgrades, but six weeks later, graphic tool stumbled in an article that was highly dependent on by cherries Picked and misleading reformulated SMS messages, “claims it.
'But the simpler explanation is that the New York Times already started building its defamatory article at the latest 31 October 2024, including the development of a slick new graphic display module to prominent the misleading processed and context-striped text messages in the article to contain ,. '
The changed suit also focuses on a promotional video made for the Times article that the readers promised: “This story reveals a new playbook for conducting a far-reaching and largely non-detectable smear campaign in the digital age.”
The Baldoni team says it has a date of December 12 in its web URL, indicating that it was made a different pre-packed element before the California dating date.
Such a material, according to them, would not enjoy the usual legal protection offered to reporters who quote from published legal documents.
As their submission explains: 'It may not seem surprising and even respectable that a news organization must work for weeks or months before an alleged research report is published.
'But the importance of the timing of these elements of the defamatory article is that they dismiss the legal shields that lively, the times, and the other lively parties probably trusted the protection of their malignant burdens, such as the Legal Investigation and the Fair Reporting Persons. '
Baldoni changed Pak suggests that the story of the New York Times contained buried instructions in his metadata that suggested that the reporters of the outlet had worked on it for much longer than a day (Blake Lively Forly)
Their changed suit also adds a updated timeline that goes back until 1 January 2019, when Baldoni first e -mailed Colleen Hoover, the author ends with us, about changing her highly praised book in a film.
It includes his communication with both lively and her Megastar husband Reynolds, as well as details of the release and the response ending with us, and every development in the subsequent legal battle.
Lively, 37 and Baldoni, 40, how to scourge beautifully on the screen for the 2024 adjustment of Hoover's much -praised novel that explored domestic violence and emotional abuse, which became a surprise hit at the Kassa, with $ 351 million.
But dualing lawsuits have since revealed how relationships are said to be lively against Baldoni against more artistic control and began to feel increasingly uncomfortable during their intimate scenes.
Lively was the first to submit and claimed that Baldoni came in her trailer while she was topless, showed her graphic video of his wife who bite the birth and sucked on her lips during an improvised pillow scene.
She accused him of conspiracy to lubricate her reputation and quoted an SMS from Baldoni's publicist Melissa Nathan who read: “We can bury someone.”
Lively, 37 and Baldoni, 40, how to scourge beautifully on the screen for the 2024 adaptation of Hoover's much -praised novel who explored domestic violence and emotional abuse, which became a surprise hit at the Kassa, with an opinion of $ 351 million; shown on set last year
Her claims for sexual harassment made worldwide headlines thanks to the near-simultaneous publication of the story of Times that quoted heavily from the complaint.
Baldoni reacted by suggesting the Times for $ 250 million and claimed that it “almost completely trusted the non-rewarded and self-serving story of Lively, almost literally lifting it while they ignore an abundance of evidence that her claims arose.”
The newspaper is planning to 'vigorously defend against the court case', according to her spokesperson.
Then Baldoni Lively and Reynolds visited, which turned the story upside down by claiming that it was their team that the lubrication and asked for $ 400 million compensation.
He accused her of turning the meaning of his texts and e -mails and together with Leslie Sloane, a powerful Hollywood publicist, to plant harmful stories about him in the media.
It was all a trick, argued Baldoni, to rebuild the reputation of Lively after she came in for criticism because she was spiky and difficult in interviews and promotional events.
It ends with our Costars are involved in a tense legal battle, which started after lively accused of sexual harassment; Baldoni seen last month
Every negative publicity around his blonde -leading lady was “organic”, claims his suit.
De Vee took another explosive turn when DailyMail.com previously published unseen raw video images from Baldoni and filmed a romantic dance scene as their characters Lily Bloom and Ryle Kincaid.
The suit of Lively claims that Baldoni leaned forward and slowly dragged his lips off her ear and dragged through her neck as he said, it smells so good 'during interaction.
In the images obtained by DailyMail.com, the couple are seen who is concerned with what seems playful, but professional chatter between Takes.
At the crucial moment Baldoni Lively asks if he gets 'beard' on her. “I probably get spray tan on you,” she replies. That asks Baldoni to say 'it smells good' before they both laugh.
Baldoni's famous lawyer Bryan Freedman marked the images as proof that his client behaved in the right way and 'had nothing to hide'. It went vividly that it confirmed her claims of intimidation.
DailyMail.com further revealed on Friday that Lively Freedman's lawyers wanted to do her deposition and that they are being beaten with a GAG -Bevel -Bevel -Bevel -Beschebeling and retaliation 'comments on the media.
“Parties at lawsuits simply do not have the right to dictate which of the lawyers of their opponents can or may not make their statement,” Baldoni lawyer Kevin Fritz shot back.
