Judges who refer to male rapists for their desired pronouns before the court have been warned that the language is 'extremely inappropriate' and can be biased.
The guidance comes in the midst of a series of high -profile cases in which sex attackers who identified as women were called 'they'.
Advice has been given by the judicial office that judges must avoid to set up defendants as the opposite sex in the case of violent violations.
The directive was sent to all holders of the judicial office in England and Wales last month and refers to updated guidelines in the Equal Treatment Bench Book (ETBB).
It stated: 'Usually it should not be problems to refer to those who appear in court, which they want to be referred to.
'The updated version of the English and Welsh ETBB makes it clear that in some cases it is not suitable, or even extremely inappropriate, in court to use a defendant's preference, for example in cases of violent or sex crimes by a transgender perpetrator. '
Further guidelines suggest that judges should stop using the preferred forests of transgender people in cases that depend on the recognition of a person's biological sex to prevent them from appearing to be biased.
In September last year, Lexi Secker, 35, was sentenced to six and a half years in a men's prison – but only after he was called 'she' in court.
Secer, 35, a father of two, whose birth name Alexander was, was on social media who attacked the controversial figures that are in the Transrij's robes
Protesters who demanded safe spaces for women gather outside the tribunal for a nurse who was so 'uncomfortable' in the prospect of changing for her transcollega that she left and waited in the hallway
The directive was sent to all holders of the judicial office in England and Wales last month, so that they have been referred to updated guidelines in the even treatment book (file image)
Secer had started identifying after the attack and cried when a judge said that he “had taken into account how difficult a prison sentence in a male institution would be.”
Earlier that year, Transgender Cat Killer and murderer Scarlet Blake – who had identified the government as a biologically a man – was admitted by the police who solved the case as a female perpetrator.
An increasing number of cases of family rights, in which parents are a legal dispute about their children who are allowed to change gender, has insisted on judges to prevent the use of conditional pronouns from suggesting no bias for one party.
Instead, the officials advised to use the gender -neutral pronoun 'she' to 'minimize the attack'.
The guidelines for the judicial office have been issued in response to a recent ruling on pronouns in an employment tribunal that is heard in Scotland.
The tribunal relates to nurse Sandie Peggie who claimed to be made to be changed alongside Dr. Beth Upton, a transwoman, is illegal intimidation under the equality act.
Women's Rights Groups have expressed their concern about the identification trend, while the mission of the judicial office of some Campaigners from Trans Rights has led to indignation.
Maya Forstater, Chief Executive of Campagnegroep Sex Matters, The Telegraph said: 'It is a relief to see this recognition through the judicial office that sex always matters when referring to alleged perpetrators of violence and sexual violence, because these crimes almost be fully committed by gentlemen.
Sandie Peggie objected to Dr. Beth Upton using the changing facility in the A&E in the Victoria Hospital in Kirkcaldy, FIFE
“Too long victims of these crimes not only had to hear male perpetrators being referred to as” women “and” she/her “in court, but were put under pressure to address perpetrators as women.”
Sarah Phillimore, a lawyer -lawyer, said: “I am very happy to see this – it is a welcome step forward to accept that gender identity ideology is controversial and disputed and should not only be embraced by the judiciary.”
