Asylum seekers who were released by a decision by the Supreme Court in 2023, are sent to Nauru after the Pacific Island agreed to issue Visa, said Tony Burke Minister of the Interior on Sunday.
The 149 non-citizens released from detention by the Landmark pronunciation included a convicted pedophile who sexually abused a 10-year-old boy and a hitman who was responsible for the murder of a pregnant woman.
The case was a political disaster for the government accused of not had unforeseen measures if the court ruling was against it.
Now the government has found a solution, with three asylum seekers who have failed the 'character test' to get 30-year-old Nauru-Visa and to be removed from Australia, with more.
“When someone has come to treat Australians in a way that shows a terrible character, their visas are canceled and when their visas are canceled, they must leave,” said Mr Burke.
“They will be placed on an airplane and sent to Nauru as soon as schemes can be made.”
Mr Burke refused to outline how many Australian taxpayers would be on the hook for Nauru to remove the three prisoners from their hands, but pointed out that there was also a price.
'Yes, there are costs for achieving a scheme with third countries, [but] There are also costs for the high level of monitoring … That happens when these people in the community are here in Australia. '
Three violent perpetrators will be removed from Australia after they have been granted by Nauru in the long term in a deal with the Albanian government
Nauru President David Adeang (left) and Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanian shaking hand in a press conference in the parliament house in December
He expected more visas to be granted by the Nauruan government because more cases are found unsuitable because they remain in Australia.
The minister said that the deleted would be housed in a facility in Nauru with a shared kitchen space and would be free to move over the island and also have working rights.
Mr Burke marked their current expulsion by law.
The pronunciation of the Supreme Court stems from the Nzyq case, where a stateless Rohingya man from Myanmar was confronted with the prospect of lifelong detention, because no country would restore him after his conviction for raping a 10-year-old boy in Australia.
The court ruled that immigration removal is illegal if there is 'no real prospect' that deportation will be feasible in the 'reasonably foreseeable future'.
As a result of the decision, 149 asylum seekers who had been held in indefinite detention were considered too dangerous to be on the street and without other land to deport them released into the community.
Seven had committed murder and attempted murder, 37 sexually -based offensive, including sex about children; 72 Assault and violent offensive, including kidnapping and armed robbery; 16 Domestic violence and stalking and 13 serious drug design.
Less than five were involved with people who smuggled and fewer than five were involved in a low level or no criminal offenses.
The minister said that the deleted would be housed in a facility in Nauru with a shared kitchen space and would be free to move over the island and also have working rights
Their release caused a political headache for work after the coalition seized by alleged repeat offense to hit the government because he no longer did to keep them locked up after the court's ruling.
In an attempt to manage the cohort, the government imposed single monitors and evening clocks, causing the prison to be threatened for those who do not comply with.
Powers were assumed in December to enable the minister to pay third countries to take people in immigration removal.
Opposition leader Peter Dutton focused on the record of Labor on Immigration and said that the coalition was confronted with a different borders 'mess' when it returned to power after the upcoming elections.
“But) we are happy to look at the regulations that the government has set up,” he said in Darwin.
