Keir Starmer has indicated a partial climb about the controversial plans of the government to let the technical giants plunder the work of the British writers, musicians and artists.
The government has been fired from figures such as Sir Elton John and Sir Paul McCartney, who warn that there is a plan to give copyright exception to companies that develop artificial intelligence (AI), would destroy the world-leading creative industry of Great Britain.
Downing Street has been shaken by the power of the recoil from the worlds of music, film and literature.
Yesterday, the government slipped new figures, which showed that a consultation about this issue received no fewer than 11,500 answers.
The prime minister spoke with reporters this week while he was in the United States, and said he was determined that he was determined that the creative industry should be able to 'bloom'.
Asked if the government's plans were “put in stone,” he replied, “No, the only thing that happened is that there has been a consultation.”
Printed on the fact that the creative sector was bitter against the preferred option of the government, he added: “But we had a consultation. We will revise the answers to the consultation.
'The creative sector is clearly really important for our economy. AI is really important for our economy and we will assess it in that light.
Keir Starmer (photo) has indicated a partial climb about the controversial plans of the government to let the technical giants plunder the work of the British writers, musicians and artists
The government has been fired from figures such as Sir Elton John (photo), who warn that Labor's plans would destroy the world leading creative industry of Great Britain
Artists, including Sir Paul McCartney (depicted), complain that the government's plans would enable them to have their work stolen effectively and not to make the sector commercially feasible
“But I will be clear, I want to thrive that creatives. I think they are really important for our country – not only the contribution to the economy, but also to our global reputation. '
Technology companies that develop AI demand the right to use copyright protected material to 'train' their computer models.
Artists complain that this would enable them to stolen their work effectively and not make the sector commercially feasible.
The government has proposed an 'opt -out' system that is aimed at allowing individual artists to protect their work.
But critics warn that it would be unworkable and the current 'Wild West' system can continue.
Ministers are now supposed to consider extra protection to try to ensure that artists are paid for their work.
But government sources have said that they believe that leaving the plans would fully emphasize, British AI developers would emphasize, making them less competitive against American giants.
The situation was further complicated this week when Sir Keir and Donald Trump indicated that they wanted to sign a trade agreement with a deeper cooperation in the field of technology and AI.
Health secretary Wes Streeting acknowledged yesterday that the creative sector was confronted for challenges as a result of the 'disruptive' impact of AI.
He told Radio Four's Today program: “I have seen the worries that artists are living and they are completely legitimate.”
He said the government worked to find a solution that maintains the principles of fairness and freedom. ”
“This is a revolution that will change every aspect of our lives, our work, our culture,” he added.
“We see all that disruption that is accompanied by revolutionary moments.”
Mr Streeting urged critics to break down attacks on technological secretary Peter Kyle, who came under fire about his cozy ties with tech bosses.
Campaigners accused Mr Kyle of 'Drinking the Kool Aid' after a maximum of 30 meetings with large technology companies such as Apple, Google, Meta and Amazon, in just three months.
But Mr Streeting insisted that the meetings were part of his task to ensure that “Great -Britain leads and shape that revolution.”
He said that the creative sector “should welcome the relationship,” Mr. Kyle is building the technical giants “because that relationship comes influence.”
