Keir Starmer is confronted with an uprising above plans to saw £ 5 billion out of well -being while the government is clapping to balance the books.
Labor MPs have warned about 'deep concern' above 'Draconian' curbs with details that are expected to be announced tomorrow.
Liz Kendall will declare that employees who lose their job should get more than long -term claimants. Check-ups on those who receive disease payments must also be strengthened.
The majority of the savings will probably arise from making it more difficult to get personal independence payments, while handicaps -outs -outs can be frozen in cash in cash.
Ministers have made the 'moral' case for the reforming of well -being, in which Rachel Reeves point to the nearly million young people who are not in education, work or education.
The Chancellor fights to prevent the need for more tax increases in the spring statement later this month, after retaining economic growth and rising debt costs with her budget plans.
She is also under enormous pressure to increase the expenditure of the defense in the midst of the rising alarm at the US that withdraws the support from Europe and does deals with Russia.
Liz Kendall will explain that employees who lose their job should get more than long -term claimants
The bill has risen and is expected to continue to rise
The benefits for health and the disabled in Sicknote Groot -Britain are expected to cost more than £ 100 billion a year by the end of the decade – a little more than the defense budget, even after the recent boost of Keir Starmer.
The Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) estimated in October that the costs of long-term disease will increase handouts from £ 64.7 billion in the financial year 2023-24 to £ 100.7 billion in 2029-30.
That would be about 3 percent of GDP, while Labor has promised to spend 2.5 percent in 2027 and watch 3 percent after the next elections.
Speaking with the Westminster Hour of the BBC on Sunday, said Labor MP Rachel Maskell that colleagues were 'deeply delivered' about the prospect of changes in the system.
She told the program: “We acknowledge the economic conditions in which we find ourselves and the hand that was given to us and of course it is precisely that the Chancellor supervises all those budgets, but not at the expense of pushing the disabled in poverty.”
She added: 'There must be a carrot approach, not a stick approach.
“We have to make the right interventions and that doesn't start with the stick.”
Mrs. Maskell said she had picked up […] Deep deep concern 'of colleagues and called for a' compassionate system and not just draconian cuts'.
Labor's David Pinto-DuSchinsky, the MP for Hendon in Northwest London, leads a group of three dozen MPs of the Get Britain working group that claims that the system has been broken and must be determined.
There are claims that a maximum of 80 MPs are ready to oppose the reforms.
But they are confronted with Push-Back from Pro-Change MPS. Labor's David Pinto-DuSchinsky, the MP for Hendon in Northwest London, leads a group of three dozen MPs of the Get Britain working group that claims that the system has been broken and must be determined.
The government wants to create a new, limited benefit for those who no longer have themselves after paying in the system, called 'Unemployment Insurance'.
It will have a lower age limit – probably around 22 years – with various support that are announced for young people outside of work.
The goal is that those who have not deposited into the system to get less out of it than those who did that.
However, exemptions will be present for those who cannot work due to severe disabilities.
The welfare system originally had a much larger contributing element after the Second World War, but that was gradually eroded by governments of all colors.
Ministers have done the 'moral' matter for the reforming of welfare, in which Rachel Reeves point to the near-million young people who are not in education, work or training
Figures before the end of last year showed the number of neets that was approaching a million
Mrs. Kendall has been set to announce the changes to the Commons this week, possibly tomorrow.
She tries to save around £ 5 billion from the welfare account, with most of the cuts that are expected to come from changes to personal independence payments (PIP).
It is expected that a action against personal independence payments will sharpen the rules, which may affect those with disorders such as anxiety and depression.
The PIP rate will also be frozen in cash, rather than 1.7 percent rise like other benefits.
The claimants of new diseases benefits go through an assessment of work capacities, which must be repeated at intervals.
That gap is intended to vary Six months to three years, depending on the severity of the disease. About 607,000 repeat assessments were carried out in 2019, but it dives during Covid and last year it was thought that it had been around a third of that level.
The OBR has suggested that the slump in checks is the biggest factor behind rising claims, in which allies of Mrs. Kendall De Telegraaf told that she is looking at ways to stimulate controls.
Minister of the Cabinet Pat McFadden said yesterday that without action, four million people would have for the long -term benefits.
“There are 2.8 million people with long -term benefits,” he told the Sunday of the BBC with Laura Kuenssberg.
'We are a bite in the UK and not in a good way. We are the only G7 country that has not found its pre-Pandemic rate of employment and we are the Labor Party.
“We believe in work. We believe in the good that a good job can do for people. We do not believe that it is good that if someone could work with a little support, they remain to live a life in benefits.
'200,000 of those 2.8 million told us that they would work with the right support tomorrow. So we have to reform the system, because if we don't, the process is to stand back and not to do anything that in a few years it will not be 2.8 million, it will be more than 4 million people. We can't allow that. '
A government source said: 'The challenge we inherited and the case for change is grim.
“When this government took office last July, more than 9.3 million working people were without work without work – that is more than the entire population of London. 2.8 million of them were unemployed due to long -term illness – the highest in the G7. '
