Donald Trump has warned that the use of the 'monster' nuclear weapons 'of America could happen tomorrow', in what a veiled threat seems to be for the enemies of Washington while the world is faltering on the edge of a global war.
The B-83 is the most powerful weapon in the nuclear arsenal of the United States, able to induce undefaster damage to the civilian population and wiping all cities away.
The destruction that it would unleash it if it were used would be on a scale that has never been seen before – with the 1.2 Megatonne loading, making it about 75 times more powerful than the Nuke who explodes about Hiroshima.
Estimates brought the number killed in the bombing of 1945 to around 140,000, while projections for the number of people who would lose their lives if the B-83 in the millions were to fall on a large city stand.
The radiation issued by such a bomb depends on where it explodes, but also whether it explodes on the ground or in the air, whereby the earth absorbs about half of it in a surface explosion, while an explosion with low air would maximize the destruction.
In an Airburst, the B-83 would release a fireball that measures more than one and a half square miles, which decimates everything in this area, according to a model produced by nuclear technology historian Alex Wellerstein.
The radioactive fall -out would also provide miles, where everyone within a radius of about eight miles is exposed to a 500 brake ionizing radiation dose – enough to prove fatally for the majority of those who are exposed to it within a month.
The powerful weapon would be able to eradicate underground bunkers near the epicenter and would seriously damage or completely destroy concrete buildings in the heavy explosion, which would cover around 6.5 square miles.
US President Donald Trump has admitted that he believes that nuclear weapons pose the greatest threat to humanity
Donald Trump has warned that the use of the 'Monster' nuclear weapons of America could happen tomorrow '(stock image)
Fatal victims in this area would be almost 100 percent. Later in the 'moderate' explosion, most residential buildings would collapse and many people would lose their lives, with all the persistent injuries.
Thermal radiation would cover an area of more than 210 square miles-which means that everyone in this area that was not immediately killed would suffer life-changing third-degree burns, as well as radiation disease in many cases.
If, for whatever reason, Washington chose to drop the B-83 on Moscow, around 1.3 million people would be killed and more than 3.7 million injured.
The world -famous Bolshoi Theater, Red Square and the Kremlin – the Government seat of Vladimir Putin – would be erased by the first fireball, which would wipe away many of the historic buildings of the city, as well as more modern concrete blocks.
There would be a similar death toll of about 1.3 million in Pyongyang if the center of the capital of North Korea was the target, with the Juche tower of the Hermit State and the arch of Triumph under the monuments that would be eradicated.
In the meantime, around 1.5 million people would lose their lives if Beijing was hit, with Tiananmen -Square, the forbidden city and the headquarters of the Communist Party all destroyed by fire and the power of the impact.
The victims would be even higher in Tehran, according to the projections of Professor Wellerstein, with 2.6 million possible losing their lives and 3.7 million injured.
If the center of the Iranian capital were to be hit, the historic Golestan Palace and its surroundings would be burned down immediately, while the Azadi tower would be damaged a little further from the city or destroyed if the immense heat would lead to burning out in the area.
The supreme leader of Iran Ayatollah Ali Khamenei speaks during a meeting in Tehran
The Kremlin – the Government seat of Vladimir Putin – would be erased by the first fire ball if a B -83 would fall on Moscow
North -Korean leader Kim Jong Un, Right, and his daughter inspect a rocket on Pyongyang International Airport in Pyongyang, Noord -Korea
If Washington chose for whatever reason to focus Beijing with the B-83, around 1.3 million people would die. Displayed: Chinese President Xi Jinping
The deadly potential of the B -83 – with the weapon as the last Megatonne -Bom in Arsenal, USA – has led to countless attempts to get it since it was put into use in 1983.
Former President Barack Obama tried to get rid of the bomb, but his decision to do this was reversed by President Trump in his first term of office.
Joe Biden then made the efforts to get rid of the Nuke, but received a loyal opposition from Republican legislators who claimed that the weapon was needed to hit deeply buried goals.
Now Trump has warned that nuclear weapons are the greatest threat to humanity, which yesterday suggests that American nuclear heads are able to 'end the world' in a clear reference to the principle of mutually insured destruction.
Trump, who has the second largest nuclear stock at his disposal after the Russian Putin, made the shock statement in an interview last week.
“We spend a lot of money from nuclear weapons – the level of destruction goes beyond everything you can imagine,” he told Fox News.
Russian service members ride a BTR-82A armored staff carrier along the red square last year during a rehearsal for a military parade
If the center of the capital of Noord -Korea was the target, the Juche tower and the arch of Triumph (photo) would be from the Hermit State to the monuments that would be eradicated
“It's just bad that you have to spend all this money on something that when it is used, it is probably the end of the world.”
The Republican added that the threat of climate change was nothing compared to the risks of nuclear weapons, and claimed that a nuclear war could happen tomorrow. '
Trump explained: 'I watched Biden for years, saying that the existential threat comes from the climate. I said “no.”
“The biggest is in the shelves in different countries called 'nuclear weapons' those big monsters that can blow your head miles and miles and miles away.”
Despite the fact that the American stock was reduced, Trump indicated during the first weeks of his second presidential term that he would like to reduce the number of nuclear weapons in the world.
It is unclear whether this is the official position of his administration.
The president revealed last week that he had sent a letter to the Top Authority of Iran who put pressure on them to close a nuclear deal, while also threatened military action if none was reached.
'There are two ways in which Iran can be treated militarily or you make a deal. I'd rather close a deal, “Trump told Fox News.
“I'd rather negotiate a deal. I am not sure if everyone agrees with me, but we can close a deal that would be as good as you won soldier, “Trump said.
“But time happens now, time is coming. Something is going to happen in one way or another. I hope Iran, and I wrote them a letter and told them that I hope you will negotiate, because if we have to go in a soldier, it will be terrible for them. '
During his first term of office, Trump withdrew from Iran's nuclear deal in 2018.
Last month, Trump said he was willing to reopen the negotiations of arms control with both China and Russia.
He said in the White House: 'There is no reason for us to build brand new nuclear weapons. We already have so many.
'You could destroy the world 50 times more than 100 times. And here we build new nuclear weapons and they build nuclear weapons. '
He added: “We all spend a lot of money that we could spend on other things that are actually, hopefully, much more productive.”
While the US currently has 5,177 nuclear core heads, including 1,477 waiting to be dismantled, this is far removed from its peak supply of 31,255 nuclear heads in the late 1960s.
Little boy, given the name to the L-11 nuclear bomb that was dropped on Hiroshima and the first to ever be used in warfare has a load of only 15 kilotonne-one fraction of the destructive potential of the B-83.
The drop of nuclear bombs on the Japanese city and Nagasaki three days later in the last days of the Second World War mark the only time that nuclear weapons have been used in battle to date.
But with an increasingly fleeting global worldwide security situation, considered by many analysts as the worst such crisis since the Cold War, rhetoric about the possible use of these random weapons in Washington, Moscow and other nuclear arming states around the world.
