A romance fraudster who has misled women to pay him nearly £ 200,000, deportation was saved after a judge said that the health care system in his nigeria native country could not meet the medical needs of his wife and children.
Emmanuel Jack, 35, was imprisoned for three years in 2014 after he praised as an architect on dating websites and felled six vulnerable women to pay him £ 186,000.
In 2022, the Home Office noted that he had to be sent back to Nigeria, the country he had left with his parents when he was 10, so that Jack encouraged a legal offer to stay in the UK.
An immigration and asylum tribunal in London has discovered that a statement is that deportation would be too loud about the British woman and children of Mr Jack, who suffer from complex medical problems and are dependent on his care.
Tribunal judges Victor Rae-Reves and Luke Bulpitt heard that his wife has medical problems arising from pregnancy.
His 18-month-old son, who was born prematurely, has serious development issues that require close supervision and specialist care, while his six-year-old daughter suffers from the point of view of vision, the tribunal was told.
Mr Jack Wife has a 16-year-old daughter from an earlier relationship for whom he also offers care, heard the tribunal. The daughter outlined the 'major role' that Mr Jack plays in her life in a letter, where she suggested that 'the family would fall apart without him'.
'We found that [the wife and two children] All long -term care for acute medical disorders, “the judges said.
Emmanuel Jack, 35, was imprisoned for three years in 2014 after he praised as an architect on dating websites and had misled six vulnerable women to pay him £ 186,000
An immigration and asylum tribunal in London ruled that deportation would be unnecessarily hard about the British wife and children of Mr Jack, who suffer from complex medical issues and trust him
'For each of them, that care regularly evaluate consultants, detailed continuous investigations and an important treatment regime.
'Moving to Nigeria would considerably disturb that care, frustrate continuous investigations and end the consistency of the care they have received so far.
'We believe that even if the treatment is available, it is considerably more difficult to be treated at the same location for all three.
'Yet we believe it would be too hard for [them] To each leave their regular consultants and multidisciplinary teams who know them and their circumstances well, to test the whims of the Nigerian health system.
'In particular, we have discovered that there are continuous and serious studies with regard to [Mr Jack’s son] And even if care is available for him in Nigeria, it is unlikely that it is the tailor -made multidisciplinary attention that he is currently benefiting from. '
Jack came to Great Britain in 1997 and received indefinite leave to stay. He became a business student at the University of Salford.
Between 2011 and 2012, however, he focused on 'lonely' women in the UK and in the US, together with a co-perpetrator to perform the fraudulent campaign.
He used Aliases, including John Creed, John Windsor and Johnnie Carlo Rissi to convince women to send him money.
After his arrest and before his conviction, Mr Jack successfully applied for British citizenship.
He was imprisoned for three years in March 2014. Revised the home office and then withdrew his British citizenship before he inquired in November 2022 that he would be deported.
After his release from prison, the tribunal heard, he met a British woman to whom he has been married for more than six years.
Jack argued that 'deportation would have an unnecessary effect on his partner and children and amounts to a disproportionate interference in private life that he had established in the United Kingdom'.
It was heard that there are 'exceptionally narrow ties in the family', in which the priest of the family stated that 'deportation would have a harmful effect on family life and would be disastrous'.
“Deportation would tear a loving family apart,” said the priest.
The tribunal accepted that the medical evidence was indicative of Mr Jack's deep involvement in the care of [his children]', finding him as a' loving and very practical father who plays a key role in their upbringing '.
The tribunal also acknowledged that “the medical challenges with which the family face has led them to become a particularly close family.”
'We think so [Mr Jack] Helps both children with their medical needs and therapies and his absence may have a harmful effect on their health because of the limitations that [his wife] Can be confronted when fulfilling such practical tasks, “said the panel.
'We conclude that, given the extremely close relationships that, in these specific circumstances [Mr Jack] shares with [his family]” [his] The separation of the family as a result of deportation would have a very large emotional and psychological impact on them that goes much further than the impact that can be experienced where there is not such a close -knit and uninterrupted shared history.
'We think that the power and depth of [his] Relationships with his wife and children and the close involvement that he has under their care for a longer period means that it is very likely that the young children in particular would have an emotional, psychological and practical impact as a result of [his] Removal that is too hard.
'All these factors weighed and have the appropriate account of the public interest in the deportation of foreign criminals … We are nevertheless satisfied that the effect of the expulsion of the expulsion of [Mr Jack] would be unnecessarily hard [his wife and children]. '
