Joe Biden gave Kamala Harris a hair -raising warning on the day of her debate with Donald Trump after taking over the democratic nomination, according to an upcoming book.
The president publicly supported Harris's offer on the White House and supported her campaign platform, but behind the scenes he was more concerned about how she encouraged his presidency.
The moment was told in the upcoming book battle: Inside the Styste Battle for the White House by Jonathan Allen and Amie Parnes, which describes how Biden tried to keep Harris on the belt.
“He would publicly say that Harris should do what she needs to win. But private, including in conversations with her, he repeated a admonition: don't let there be daylight between us, “the authors wrote.
After he was forced out of the race after his disastrous debate performance against Trump and questions about his age, Biden reportedly “expected Harris to protect his legacy.”
On the day Harris would be at Trump's debate stage, Biden shouted to give Harris an unusual kind of pep talk – and another memory of the loyalty he demanded, “the authors wrote.
Allegedly Biden Harris gave a warning of three words: “No daylight, kid.”
Joe Biden reportedly said Kamala Harris that there should be 'no daylight' between them during her doomed presidential run, because he was more concerned with his legacy than winning, according to a new book
Biden would have called Harris for her debate with Donald Trump in September and given her a Pep talk of three words: “No daylight, kid”
The book continued that Biden was not aimed at 'whether she won or lost the elections' but on how he would be reminded.
“He thought, she would only harm him by publicly distancing herself from him – especially during a debate that would be viewed by millions of Americans.
“As far as she wanted to forge her own path, Biden had no interest in giving her room.”
The book is one of the many inside -looks at the end of the Biden presidency that comes to the fore in the summer, with another of journalist Chris Whipple, Uncharted: How Trump defeated Biden, Harris, and the chance in the wildest campaign in history, claimed that Biden was so he had FLUORTAAPE from it.
In the fight, the authors claim that Biden was seen by many as an Albatros around Harris' Nek who wore her candidacy during the elections.
During the bruising campaign, the Biden employees remained at the Harris campaign, making it even more difficult to publicly refute the president.
Sean Clegg, a Harris adviser who was not trusted by Biden's employees, helped her to prepare for a joint performance with Tim Walz when she started listing things she and Biden achieved.
'Wait, wait, wait! Let's not do this. Let's not continue the memory, “Clegg said, according to a fragment published by De Hill.
Clegg was reportedly not carried out from future media -prep sessions by the old DEM communication -employee Stephanie Cutter.
Biden was forced from the race after his disastrous debate against Donald Trump in June and questions above his age, but upcoming books claim that he still undermined Harris's candidacy on concern about his estate
Insiders claimed that Biden was an albatros around Harris' Nek during the elections
Biden was previously blamed by senior Harris advisor David Plouffe because he refused to put in the race earlier after his debate disaster in June.
Plouffe claimed that no democratic candidate could have won without a good primary process – what he called 'the cardinal sin' of this race.
And he said he was shocked by the internal polls when he finally came to the team after Joe Biden stopped with less than four months to go, a situation he described as 'catastrophic'.
'When I came in, it was the first time I saw the actual figures under the hood. They were pretty horrible, “he told the Atlantic Ocean.
'The sun band was worse than the blue wall, but the blue wall was bad. And a demographic point of view, young voters were in a really terrible form across the board – poor voters, black voters, Asian voters.
'When the switch happened, some of that stuff got a little better, but not nearly where we ended up or where we had to be. This was a rescue mission.
“It was catastrophic in terms of where it was.”
