A trip to the British coast is synonymous with white pebble beaches, fish and chips and pastel chalets serene view of the beach.
But there is nothing peaceful on the beach scalets on the coast of Dorset, where almost half of the leaseholders claim that they were unfairly deported by a group of 'shameful' older ladies of their huts by the sea.
Families claim the trust, run by a group of exclusive women who supervise the property in Weymouth, have deported them to provide an alleged violation of rules without proving.
While others, who have been rental holders for years, are forced to leave because they do not live in the area.
In the meantime, other leaseholders, who have been vigilant about the rules that the group deserve to be deported.
A resident, who chose to remain anonymous, said MailOnline: 'The people who were kicked out deserve to be kicked out. I've been in the chalet for 10 years. There are rules and if you break the rules, you are gone.
“The committee did well. They have set up new doors and they have painted it and they have upgraded it. They don't get thanks. '
Greenhill Community Trust (GCT) took the run of the chalets in Greenhill Gardens and along the promenade of the Weymouth city council in 2019.
Families claim the trust, run by a group of exclusive women who supervise the property in Weymouth, have deported them to provide an alleged violation of rules without evidence
Judy Haley (photo), 69, who has her chalet for two years, says she feels 'sorry' for the situation, but has had no problems with the Greenhill Community Trust
Greenhill Community Trust (GCT) took over the run of the Chalets in Greenhill Gardens and along the Promenade of the Weymouth City Council in 2019
They manage the properties of the municipality in Weymouth, which are rented for £ 1,600 a year.
Trust has set out 19 people for the breaking of 'electricity rules', the start -up families of which claim was the fault of workers who carried out maintenance on behalf of the confidence.
However, the anonymous resident explained that workers always enter his chalet and never forget to eliminate electronics.
He added: 'It is their own fault of which they are told not to leave their electricity behind. The builders who come in and leave their chargers is nonsense.
“There is even a woman who was kicked out in America.”
Trust has also set out all the families without a local address, a movement that has labeled them as 'Zero Community Spirit'.
But Carmel Starr, who has been living in Weymouth for years and dreamed of a beach chalet, so that she can spend time on the beach with her grandchildren, thinks that trust is fair.
She said to MailOnline: 'They kick out non-Weymouth residents, which I think is completely correct, because they can then be used regularly.
The Trust has deported 19 people to violate 'electricity rules', the start -up families claim that it was the fault of workers who carried out maintenance on behalf of the Trust
The GCT manage the properties of the Council in Weymouth, which are rented out for £ 1,600 per year
Trust has set out all the families without a local address, a movement that has labeled them as 'Zero Community Spirit'
'We would like to come here with our grandchildren and have access to the beach.
“Some time ago I showed interest in getting one and I was told” no chance “and I showed interest again and I didn't even get a recognition.
“I feel that management could be more transparent, so if you apply, they recognize your application and tell you if you are on the waiting list.”
The group that has been released from their chalets said that they received a letter from scratch on January 19, stating that their licenses would not be extended.
They tried to appeal the decision, but claimed that the GCT refused to conduct an investigation.
A chalet pennel, who chose to remain anonymous for fear of expansion, described the situation as 'disgusting'.
He said to MailOnline: 'They are not culpable for everything they do.
'It is their way or the highway, one strike and you are from the rule they have done, is simply shameful.
Carmel Starr (photo), who has been living in Weymouth for years and dreamed of a beach chalet so that she can spend time on the beach with her grandchildren
The group that has been released from their chalets said that they received a letter from scratch on January 19, stating that their licenses would not be renewed
The chalet contract requires that tenants keep the properties in 'good decorative order', so tenants are encouraged to spend money on maintenance
'They use claims that electricity was left behind, if you left the electricity on you, you would expect to contact you and give you a warning, but they have just kicked people out.
'We are very aware that if we are found to talk to the managers, we will be kicked out for a kind of reason.
'Everyone is entering eggshells, they are absolutely scared, they are kicked out. We have spent a lot of money to do our chalet and if you are kicked out, you lose everything you put in.
“We have had our chalet for two years and we have been on the waiting list for years and now we have finally had one and we don't want to lose it because we have the children and so we are very aware of what we say and do.”
The chalet contract requires that rental holders retain the properties in 'good decorative order', so tenants are encouraged to spend money on maintenance.
The set group wrote: 'The GCT reported that an inspection had been carried out on November 11, 2024, by an independent person who established that electricity had been left behind. However, the GCT has not provided any proof of this claim.
'According to the license agreement, all refrigerators must be disconnected before September 30, 2024, which chalet users are in accordance with the license.
'During this period, GCT painters and workers entered the chalets to carry out maintenance and repairs.
The group, which was deported, tried to appeal against the decision, but claimed that the GCT refused to conduct an investigation
A chalet -yard, who chose to remain anonymous for fear of expansion, described the situation as 'disgusting'
'Many chalet holders have reported that they have found drinks, telephone chargers and other left -handed articles, which indicates that workers may have used the electricity while they are on the spot.
'Five other chalet holders are also deported on the basis of the fact that they are supposed to live from the area and are obliged to pay a higher annual reimbursement.
“Several of these people live in Chickerell and Osmington, which are clearly locally and are very part of the Weymouth area.”
They also complained that the group of directors should keep their chalets.
The group added: 'The GCT directors are the only ones who can name new directors.
'There is no consultation process, this is a clear conflict of interest, because the directors themselves are chalet occupiers and have been for many years.
'Different chalet users with years of experience have shown interest in becoming drivers, but there is no way or noticing that they can request a message.
All chalet users must be given the opportunity to be considered director of the Greenhill Community Trust CIC to guarantee a balanced group with sufficient representation to guarantee a balanced and impartial process. '
The set group complained that the GCT directors should keep their chalets
A chalet owner claimed that there was someone who lived the beach hut in Weymouth but lived in America
Lloyd Hatton, MP for South Dorset, argues for the group.
He said: “I asked if the GCT would consider meeting licenses to try to resolve disagreements. They refused
“I asked if the GCT would consider a meeting with me to discuss these issues further. They refused this too. '
Judy Haley, 69, who had her chalet for two years, says she feels 'sorry' for the situation, but has had no problems with the GCT.
She said: 'This is my second year and there is a nice community here, everyone I met is really friendly.
'I have had no problems, the people who run the chalets are fun.
“The refrigerators have finished all winter, because if you leave them, it's a fire hazard.”
The GCT is contacted for comment.
