Justin Baldoni’s $ 400 million countersuit against Blake Lively public in the midst of it ends with our drama

Justin Baldoni‘s $ 400 million against Blake Lively Has been rejected – DailyMail.com can confirm in the midst of their constant IT -end with our legal fight.

A statement obtained by DailyMail.com from the lawyers of Blake Lively read: ‘Today’s opinion is a total victory and a complete justification for Blake Lively, together with those who have dragged Justin Baldoni and the Wayfarer parties their retaliation lawsuit, including Ryan ReynoldsLeslie Sloane and the New York Times.

‘As we said from the first day, this lawsuit was’ $ 400 million’ a sham, and the court saw straight through it.

“We look forward to the next round, which is looking for lawyers, Treble damage allowance and punitive compensation against Baldoni, Sarowitz, Nathan and the other Wayfarer parties who have committed this insulting lawsuit.”

Judge Lewis J Limon has rejected the court case of Baldoni in which is accused and extortion on the basis of the fact that all its allegations were made in privileged judicial articles.

The legal battle between Lively and Baldoni officially broke out last year after rumors about tension between the two, in which the actress accused her co-star of sexual harassment and a retaliation campaign, denied allegations Baldoni.

Dailymail.com has contacted representatives for Justin Baldoni and Wayfarer Studios for comment, but should not hear yet.

Justin Baldoni’s $ 400 million Tellersuit against Blake Lively has been rejected – DailyMail.com can confirm in the midst of their current IT -end with the American legal fight – shown together in December 2023

Judge Liman said in the docket obtained by Dailymail.com: ‘The Wayfarer parties have not claimed that Lively is responsible for statements other than the statements in her CRD complaint, which are privileged.

‘The Wayfarer parties have claimed that Reynolds and [publicist Leslie] Sloane made additional statements that Baldoni accused of sexual misconduct and that the Times made additional statements that the Wayfarer parties accused of entering into a smear campaign.

‘But the Wayfarer parties did not claim that Reynolds, Sloane of the Times would have seriously doubted that these statements were true on the basis of the available information, as required to be liable for defamation under applicable legislation.

‘The additional claims of the Wayfarer parties also fail. Accordingly, the changed complaint must be rejected in its entirety. ‘

The judge ruled: ‘The Times rated the available evidence and reported, perhaps in a dramatized way, what it believed to happen. The Times did not have a clear motive to promote Lively’s version of events. ‘

Wayfarer Studios was founded by Baldoni and billionaire shopsman Steve Sarowitz in 2019.

The vibrant for the first time accused Baldoni of sexual harassment in a complaint about civil rights in December 2024, followed by a lawsuit, while Baldoni reacted by accusing her husband and Sloane of defamation and extortion in the $ 400 million lawsuit that has now been rejected.

Baldoni has denied the allegations that have denied the accusations of Baldoni by lively, while Lively, Reynolds and Sloane have denied the accusations of Baldoni.

The Baldoni team has released a website that contains private communication, such as SMS messages included in the court applications with details about his interactions with the Hollywood Power pair about making the romantic drama.

The drama between lively and Baldoni officially broke out at the end of last year

He claimed in the court applications that they made efforts to use and undermine his input if its director ends with us.

The Baldoni team said earlier that the communication that was shared on the website on the website makes things clear about the motives of both parties.

The website, which is live on Thelawsuitinfo.com online, comes to the midst of a wave of controversial lawsuits between the employees of the film, which was a hit at the Kassa last August.

Lively, a complaint of 80 pages in the civil rights of the Californian civil rights against Baldoni on December 20, before he officially submitted a federal lawsuit on 31 December.

Judge Lewis J Limon has rejected Baldoni’s lawsuit for defamation and extortion on the basis of the fact that all its allegations were made in privileged judicial articles; Alive in it ends with us

Lively in December Baldoni complained about claims of sexual harassment during the production of the film. In her lawsuit, the gossip girl Aluin Baldoni accused her of sexually bothering her in several ways – including the body of the body – and orchestrating a smear campaign against her to damage her reputation.

Baldoni and his representatives said in response to the lawsuit that has twisted the meaning of SMS messages alive and misled the audience about their interactions while making the film.

In her lawsuit Lively mentioned a number of Baldoni employees, including his company Wayfarer Studios, the CEO and Financial Backer of the studio, and PR staff Melissa Nathan and Jennifer Abel.

“I hope that my legal action helps to withdraw the curtain about these sinister retaliation actors to harm people who speak of misconduct and help protect others who can be the target,” Lively said the day after she had filed the complaint.

The Baldoni team has released a website that contains private communication, such as SMS messages included in the court applications with details about his interactions with the Hollywood Power pair about making romantic drama

Baldoni then sued the newspaper for $ 250 million in a defamation claim about a story of December 21 entitled ‘We Can Bury Elky’: Inside a Hollywood Smear Machine; ‘ The newspaper has denied the allegations.

Baldoni submitted a $ 400 million lawsuit against Lively, Reynolds and her publicist Leslie Sloane on January 16, claiming that defamation and extortion. Baldoni told the court that the trio had made up ‘false accusations of sexual harassment’ against him.

Since Lively’s complaint was submitted, Baldoni has had a number of professional consequences, including a lawsuit of a former publicist; And are dropped by the agency, which also represents lively and Reynolds.

WME has denied claims that Lively and Reynolds leaned on them to release Baldoni from their customer schedule, according to Variety.