Keir Starmer warned that at least 80 working lists could lose their seats, because their majorities are smaller than the number of voters that limit their handicap benefits
Sir Keir Starmer at least 80 is warned Work MPs run the risk of losing their seats on the government’s cuts.
Those who are against the squeeze on the benefits use an analysis of data to emphasize the ‘real electoral risk’ of the Prime Minister’s actions.
The analysis suggests that there are more than 80 work parliament members with a majority smaller than the number of disabled people on their seats that may see their benefits reduce.
They include health secretary Wes StreetingSecretary of Justice Shabana Mahmood, Minister of Billips and Minister of Education Nia Griffith.
The data, of the campaign group for disabled poverty, are shared between MPs, while Sir Keir is confronted with an increasing uprising over welfare savings, The guardian reported.
Last month, ministers determined their plans to limit access to disability and disability – such as Personal Independence Payment (PIP) – in an attempt to tackle the Balloning Welfare account of Great -Britain.
The government’s own analysis, carried out by the Department for Work and Pensions, turned out that 3.2 million families will be worse off because of the welfare changes.
Lefty MPs were furious about the cuts and warned that they would cause raised levels of poverty in Great Britain.
Sir Keir Starmer is warned that at least 80 working lists run the risk of losing their seats on the government’s cuts
Health Secretary Wes Streeting and Justice Secretary Shabana Mahmood belong to Labor MPs with a majority smaller than the number of people on their seats that can see their benefits reduce
Sir Keir has been told that he is confronted with a considerable rebellion among Labor MPs when the Lower House votes over the measures in the coming weeks.
Andy McDonald, Labor Member of Middlesbrough and Thornaby East and a former Shadow Employment Minister, is one of those who have been sent to the data of the disability campaign group.
He said: ‘The government’s welfare reforms have hit disproportionately voters who can afford it the least and that is particularly in the constituents of many Labor MPs. It is a real election risk.
‘We know that people with a low income make the money that they take home in their local communities, so this policy sucks money from our local cities.
“The government must give priority to its anti-arm control strategy before hurrying decisions to reform the well-being that harms people in need.”
Neil Duncan-Jordan, the Labor Parliament member for Poole, said: ‘It is pretty clear from the recent poll of the Joseph Rowntree Foundation that the majority of people who voted in 2024 are the proposed changes to the handicapped benefit.
‘It is not only morally wrong to focus the poor, it is also electoral foolish. The government must withdraw the green paper and return to the drawing table. ‘
The data showed that even some Labor MPs could be in danger with a healthy majorities.
In Easington, where Grahame Morris has a majority of more than 6,000 votes on Reform UK, there are more than 12,600 PIP requirements.
In Huddersfield, HarPreet Uppal has a majority of more than 4,500 above the greens, but there are 9,387 PIP requirements.
A spokesperson for the work and pensions said: “We have been clear that protecting people in need is a principle that we will never compromise about.
‘The social security system will always be there for people with serious health problems, and we will introduce a new premium for those who will never be able to work.
“Our reforms will unlock work for sick and disabled people who can and want to work – supported by supporting £ 1 billion to guarantee customized help at work – to ensure that they are supported to live with dignity and independence, while everyone who can realize the benefits of work is expected and supported to do this.”
