Social media explodes with wild accusations after Trump gave his mother a $100 bill to pay for her groceries

Wild claims have emerged that Donald Trump broke the law when he took a $100 bill from his wallet to pay for a Pennsylvania woman’s groceries.

As employees at the Sprankles grocery store in Kittanning, Pennsylvania, checked out customers, Trump reached into his wallet, pulled out a new $100 bill and handed it to the cashiers to add to the total.

“Here,” Trump said, referring to her grocery bill, “it’s going down a little bit. It just went down $100.”

“We’ll do that for you at the White House, okay?” he said, asking for her vote.

But instead of praising the act of goodwill, many on social media are claiming that what Trump did was illegal because he is a presidential candidate.

Donald Trump took $100 in cash from his wallet on Monday and handed it to a mother of three who was checking out at a local grocery store chain in western Pennsylvania.

“It is illegal for a presidential candidate, or any candidate, to hand out cash to voters in the US,” one X user claimed.

“Offering money or any form of valuable compensation in exchange for a vote is considered a bribe and is a violation of federal election laws.

“The Federal Election Campaign Act and related laws prohibit this type of conduct to ensure that elections are free and fair.”

‘Both the person offering the bribe and the person receiving the bribe may face legal consequences.

But former Federal Electoral Commission chairman Hans von Spakovsky called the claims “preliminary absurd”.

“Trump clearly made what he considered a charitable donation and that in no way affects federal law governing elections,” he told Dailymail.com.

And another legal expert says that “from his perspective, the payment appears perfectly legal.”

Spakovsky said the “thoughtful” response to “her money problems” did not violate election or campaign finance laws.

“The ‘eddies’ on social media about this are ridiculous,” he concluded.

A mother of three was grocery shopping with her three sons when Trump arrived at the store, between a roundtable of farmers and a rally — all in neighboring cities of Pittsburgh.

The FEC enforces federal campaign finance laws.

Trump visited a local grocery store chain in western Pennsylvania on Monday, where he helped pay for a woman’s groceries out of his own pocket

There is debate, however, over whether Trump was asking for her vote with his comment, or whether he was even talking about her vote at all.

Some argue that the former president was actually reiterating his promise to lower food prices.

And Mike Dimino, an election law expert and law professor at Widener University’s Commonwealth Law School, appears to have learned the same lesson from the interaction.

“It is illegal to pay someone to vote at all, to not vote, or to vote for a specific candidate. However, it is not illegal to give money to other people per se,” he told DailyMail.com

“If that were the case,” he explained, “candidates would be prohibited from donating to charity or giving money to the homeless, or perhaps even tipping a waiter or a barber. The question is whether the payment was for a vote or purely gratuitous.”

“Everything I’ve seen about the incident indicates there was no reciprocity,” Dimino concluded.

“Trump undoubtedly wanted to boost public relations by helping a consumer control inflated grocery prices, and he indicated he could do more to lower prices if elected, but he asked the woman for nothing in return for the $100.”