The Move to Cloud Repatriation: Why Organizations Are Making the Move – Part 2
This is Part 2 of a two-part series on cloud repatriation. In The Shift to Cloud Repatriation: Why Organizations are Making the Change – Part 1 , we explored the significance of edge computing and data sovereignty when considering repatriation, highlighting the strategic benefits of retaining control over data. But another key factor is the growing popularity of Kubernetes, the next evolution in application deployment and management. Kubernetes is an open-source container orchestration platform that offers organizations a compelling combination of flexibility and control. It helps companies size more dynamically for each application while controlling costs and improving performance.
Vice President Private Cloud at Rackspace.
Kubernetes and Containers: A New Era of Agility and Efficiency
While containers are billed as lightweight alternatives to full virtual machines, they pack a huge punch. From small ephemeral apps to large-scale stateful workloads, containers give organizations the ability to encapsulate applications in a consistent environment, eliminating software configuration conflicts and ensuring reliable performance across platforms. Kubernetes serves as a powerful open-source controller or orchestration platform for containers, enabling developers to seamlessly manage and scale applications.
Because Kubernetes is open source, it is accessible to anyone, at any time. Whether you’re running racks of enterprise-class servers or a few mini PCs in a store closet, Kubernetes can adapt and function seamlessly. This universal compatibility, flexibility, and ease of use empower developers to create, manage, and scale applications without the limitations traditionally imposed by specific hardware or software environments.
An additional point of appeal is the standardization that Kubernetes provides. Developers can write applications, encapsulate them in containers, and replicate those containers infinitely with consistent results. This eliminates the headache of dealing with conflicting operating systems or applications that can overwrite critical data. Containers provide a digitally perfect copy of a known-good application, which can be deployed as often as needed without variation.
All the major hyperscalers have developed advanced tools around Kubernetes, but the core value of Kubernetes remains its open-source foundation and the fact that it does not lock organizations into a single cloud provider. Kubernetes also gives organizations the ability to move configurations between different environments, including public clouds, private clouds, or even on-premises servers. That’s the real game-changer. It allows companies to avoid lock-in to a single cloud provider and gives them the freedom to choose the most cost-effective and efficient solution for each workload.
Workload Portability: The Kubernetes Advantage
Before Kubernetes, moving applications and workloads between environments was cumbersome and expensive, and continuously using public cloud resources for stable, long-running applications was not cost-effective. Now, organizations can evaluate their computing needs and optimize costs by moving workloads to the most appropriate channel, balancing cost and performance. Stable applications with predictable usage patterns can benefit from the cost savings of a private cloud, avoiding the premium costs associated with on-demand public cloud resources.
However, not all applications are suited for private clouds. Applications with sporadic, high-computation needs, such as running one-off machine learning algorithms on large datasets, are ideal for the public cloud because they allow companies to leverage significant computing power for short periods of time without long-term commitments. In contrast, applications that require continuous operation and low latency, such as incident management systems or real-time financial applications, are better suited for private clouds.
Think about it this way: Public clouds excel at providing resources for applications that can be turned off when not in use, saving costs during idle periods. But for applications that need to run 24/7, private clouds offer more predictable pricing and a lower total cost of ownership. Additionally, private clouds offer greater flexibility and lower data transfer and connectivity costs, making them more cost-effective for moving large amounts of data between locations.
The multi-cloud paradigm is here to stay, driven by the need for flexibility, cost optimization, and performance. During the pandemic, many organizations rushed to public clouds to meet immediate needs and external pressures. But it’s become clear that relying on a single provider is not a sustainable long-term strategy. Cost concerns, latency issues, and the inability to move workloads freely have underscored the limitations of a one-size-fits-all approach.
By carefully evaluating workloads and leveraging the strengths of both public and private clouds, companies can achieve the best performance, lowest costs, and ultimately better business outcomes. The future lies in this hybrid, multi-cloud approach, where the right strategy can make all the difference.
We have highlighted the best cloud storage for you.
This article was produced as part of TechRadarPro’s Expert Insights channel, where we showcase the best and brightest minds in the technology sector today. The views expressed here are those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of TechRadarPro or Future plc. If you’re interested in contributing, you can read more here:
