The rise of AI CFS: why recruiters can no longer tell real candidates of machine “perfect candidates”
- Advertisement -
Related Posts
- Advertisement -
- Many applicants admit that they would not correct AI CV boosts, even if they knew they were false
- Recruiters are now confronted with polished, manufactured applications that they can hardly distinguish from real submissions
- Hiscox says that AI-generated CVs often look impeccable, but mask overly skills and fully manufactured interests
Artificial intelligence is now a common presence in the recruitment pipeline, not only for employers, but also increasingly for applicants.
A recent campaign from specialist insurer Hiscox has drawn attention to how AI is used by job seekers, often without transparency and, in many cases, with important embellishments.
The report notes that 53% of recent applicants have used AI tools to help write their CFS. Surprisingly, most of them do not consider this cheating.
AI-generated CVs cause problems for recruiters
At first glance, AI-generated CVs often seem flawless and represent what Riscox calls the ‘perfect candidate’. But under the polished language, CVs is full of exaggerated experience and manufactured interests, so that serious questions about the reliability of AI-assisted applications.
Data from the campaign shows that 59% of job seekers believe that the use of AI tools is ‘honest play’ during the application process, while 37% admit that they would not correct AI-generated embellishments.
Pete Treloar, Chief Underwriting Officer at Riscox UK, suggested it simply: “AI can help many candidates to bring their best foot forward … but it must be used carefully.”
Recruiters are now confronted with a challenging landscape. AI -generated CVs are often indistinguishable from real – professionally polished, but are lacking specific experience or authentic personality.
And it’s not just about the CV. Candidates also use AI to prepare for interviews (29%) and complete online reviews (45%). It is no wonder that hiring managers is increasingly not sure whether they select the candidate or the algorithm.
These trends raise questions for platforms such as CV -builders And Job sitesEspecially since candidates lean heavier on automation to make their applications.
Despite the growing use of AI, not all applicants support the trend. The findings of Hiscox show that 41% believe that it gives some candidates an unfair advantage, while 42% say it is misleading for employers.
Yet the reality is that we are on our way to a future in which AI is not only accepted in accepting, but is also expected. That is a big challenge for Recruitment solutions With fair and effective recruitment practices.
Hiscox also discovered that 38% of applicants admit that they are on their CFS, and AI only makes this easier.
As Treloar concluded: “If she [recruiters] pass on incorrect information or poor recommendations to their customers, not only damages relationships, but it can also lead to more serious claims, and therefore the insurance is so important. “
Maybe you like it too
- Advertisement -
