The Sterren Slam Prince Harry project after a destructive interview about his father King Charles: ‘Dirty Laundry’ broadcast ‘

The stars of the Sunday project of Australia had a lot to say about Prince Harry this weekend.

The panel of the current affairs show responded with surprise to the Duke of Sussex A series of destructive attacks on his family launch in an amazing interview with the BBC On Friday.

Harry said in the controversial chat that he had been cut off from his father King Charles who ‘does not speak to me’ – after having lost his profession in court on his safety.

“I think it could help if he would no longer talk to cameras,” said Rachel Corbett of the project after seeing a clip of the interview.

‘People are upset, he made the comment about his father cancer‘Chimed in Co-star Sarah Harris.

“” I don’t know how long he has left “. It is an example that he was broadcast the dirty, “she added.

“Don’t forget that he wrote a book and succeeded it with a documentary and a tell-all with Oprah.”

“There is another book on the way due to its sounds,” Sam Taunton joked.

“It’s interesting if people want to tell you about something and give them so much tea, and I am no longer thirsty,” said Rachel.

During the amazing interview, Harry revealed that he “does not know how long his father has left,” his wife or children will not bring back to the UK – and said that he had had ‘so many disagreements’ with his family, some of whom may never forgive him to write a book.

Harry also said that he was ‘destroyed’ after losing his lawsuit over security and claimed that it was a ‘location stitch’.

In response, Buckingham Palace Said Harry’s security problems ‘repeatedly and carefully examined by the courts, with the same conclusion on every occasion’.

The second oldest judge in England, Sir Geoffrey Vos, told De Duke today that his ‘complaints’ about reduced safety was not ‘translated into a legal argument’.

And he ruled that the security decision had been a ‘predictable’ and even ‘sensible’ response to Megxit when Harry took a step back to be a senior royal and to stop Great -Britain.

In a devastating wide open wounds with the Royal family On Friday evening Harry told the BBC in California That he wants ‘reconciliation’ with the royal family, but was currently cut off from his father.

“He will not speak to me because of this security items,” the prince said, adding that he did not know how long the king had left to live.

“There have been so many disagreements between myself and part of my family,” he said, but he had now “forgiven them.”

Although Harry said he will reconciliationIt is understood that King Charles is still frustrated and angry with his son.

Speaking to the sun, a source close to the king said: ‘What has frustrated and upset him on a more personal level is the failure of the Duke to respect this principle.

‘And for his supporters to suggest that his father does not somehow care about his family or should intervene.

“He is especially concerned that it has received considerable resources and costs for the government to defend their position.”

Saying that he felt ‘abandoned’ and looked upset, Harry today described his defeat as a ‘good old -fashioned fixed fixed determination’ and blamed the royal household for influencing the decision to reduce his safety.

Asked if he had asked his father the king to intervene in the dispute about safety, Prince Harry said: “I never asked him to intervene – I asked him to get rid of the way and let the experts do their work.

“The RAVEC committee is an expert committee full of professionals plus the royals.”

He added: ‘Five years later, every visit I do back to the UK has to go through the royal household.

‘My representative in the RAVEC committee is the royal household to this day.

“That is not a decision I choose. I am forced to go through the royal household and to accept that they bring out my best interests during these conversations and deliberations.

“So no, I didn’t ask my father to intervene.”

When asked by the BBC what about his current security schemes he felt unsafe, the Duke of Sussex replied: “Everything.”

He continued: ‘I would not have taken over this so far if I had no compelling evidence of facts that reveal why the decision was made and I am talking to you today, where we have lost the profession, but the other party has won to keep me unsafe, so there are again many questions that many people will have.

‘I have all the truth, I now have all the knowledge, during the legal process.

‘I have discovered my worst fears and now know today on the basis of this judgment that there was no legal framework that the decisions of this body limited Ravec, on which the royal household sat down, and I did not know that this legal process in 2021 in 2021, one of the first things that hit my Jaw, was the royal household on Ravec?

In a shocking revelation, Harry also said that he would not bring his family to the UK.

He explained: ‘I can’t see a world in which I will bring my wife and children back to the UK and the things they are going to miss is all.

‘I love my country and have always done it. Despite what some people have done in that country. So I miss the uk. I miss sharing the UK. Of course I do that. I think it’s really very sad that I can’t show my children my home country. ‘

It comes when Harry is sensational today lost his struggle for armed police -free crowds in the UK -funded by the taxpayer – Put him on the hook for £ 1.5 million in costs.

The Duke of Sussex was told that his’ complaints’ about reduced security had not been translated into a legal argument ‘to successfully challenge the decision.

Harry believes he has been ‘Outstretched ‘and’ badly treated ‘for’ unjustified, inferior treatment ‘since Megxit five years ago.

His lawyer argued that the removal of the police -arms of the police when he is in the UK, left the life of the royal ‘at stake’.

Royal Royal, based in California, had fought the resignation of his claim of his High Court against the Home Office about the decision of the Executive Committee for the Protection of Royalties and Public Figures (RAVEC) that he should receive another degree of protection in the country.

But Sir Geoffrey Vos, Master of the Rolls, said this afternoon in his statement in London that the decision of Ravec was considered an understandable and perhaps predictable reaction to the claimant who had a step back from royal tasks and left the UK to mainly live abroad. “

“These were powerful and moving arguments and that it was clear that the Duke of Sussex felt bad through the system,” he said.

“But after studying the detail, I could not say that the feeling of complaints from the Duke translated into a legal argument to challenge Ravec’s decision.”

Sir Geoffrey said that Harry makes the mistake of confusing superficial analogies’ when comparing themselves with other VIPs who ‘had added nothing’ to the legal question.

He added: “My conclusion was that the Duke of Sussex would be rejected.”

It means that for the time being armed police -loose guards, paid by the British taxpayer, will not automatically be restored for him, Meghan, Archie and Lilibet when they are in the UK. It raises more questions about whether the Sussexes Groot -Britain will visit again.

The King and his youngest son are supposed to have different views on Harry’s decision to pursue his legal fight with the home office. The Minister of the Interior calls on the duke to pay all costs for both parties – an account that is approaching £ 1.5 million (AUD $ 3,099,700).