Trump administration asks the Supreme Court to allow the end of the Migrant Program of Biden era

The Trump Government on Thursday asked the Supreme Court To continue with a plan to withdraw deportation protection for migrants from four restless countries.

In an emergency request to the judges, the early lawyer -general D. John Sauer de Judges to eliminate a block that was imposed by a lower court on his efforts to reverse a Biden Administration program so that migrants from certain countries could have fly the United States and could have continued temporarily.

“The immediate intervention of this court is justified,” Mr Sauer wrote in the application, and added that a lower court “had destroyed one of the most consistent decisions about the administration of the administration.”

The BIDEN administration introduced the program, known as humanitarian conditional release, at the beginning of 2023. Under the policy, migrants from Cuba, Nicaragua, Haiti and Venezuela could fly to the United States if they had a financial sponsor and passed on security controls. About 532,000 people entered the country under the program, which allowed them to stay for two years.

The emergency application is the last in a series of high-profile Trump administration policy for the Supreme Court since President Trump started his second term, including several who test the legality of the major efforts of Mr Trump to deport migrants. Earlier this week the judges chose the side of the administration, decisive That the federal government can start enforcing a prohibition on transgender troops serving in the army that was blocked by lower courts.

On the day of the inauguration of Mr. Trump Moved to end The humanitarian conditional release program. It was one of a series of measures that the BIDEN administration had introduced, including those who were refugee to people who were fleeing Ukraine, Haiti and Latin -Marika. The goal was to discourage people from illegally crossing the border by allowing them to apply from their home country in a more orderly way.

Nevertheless, Trump administration officials were sharply critical of it, in particular Stephen Miller, a higher assistant from Mr. Trump.

In September, Mr. Miller, a primary architect of Mr. Trump’s immigration policy, scored policies on social media.

“Here is an idea: not fly millions of illegal aliens from failed states thousands of kilometers further to small cities in the American heart,” written Mr. Miller.

In February, migrants and a non -profit immigration sued The Trump government, claiming that the termination of humanitarian and other immigration parole programs “was contrary to the law, random and fickle and unconstitutional.”

On March 25 a federal judge in Massachusetts temporarily The withdrawal of the program by the administration. The court has established that the Minister of Interior Security Kristi Name did not have an authority to withdraw conditional release for all 532,000 people without providing individualized case on a case -by -case basis.

The court, Mr Sauer argued, had been involved in the assessment of the congress forbidden – unnecessarily the critical immigration policy that has been carefully calibrated to scare illegal access, to fill the nuclear -performance branch of privileges and to have democratically approved policy that was hard to see in the November elections. “

On 5 May a panel with three judges in the US Court of Appeal for the first circuit maintained The temporary block of the lower court and found that Mrs. Nemem had not made a “strong show” that her “categorical termination” of humanitarian conditional release would probably survive a judicial challenge for all migrants.

The judges asked on 15 May at 4 p.m. at 4 p.m. at 4 p.m.