On Friday, the Trump government suggested Colorado and Denver and accused the State, the city and their leaders of hindering federal immigration actions, the latest Salvo in the fight of the White House to force local authorities to perform deportations.
The lawsuit, which was brought to the federal court in Colorado and includes GOV. Jared Polis and Mayor Mike Johnston van Denver as the defendants specifically challenges or ban the state and city laws from that collaboration with federal agencies.
One state law prohibits officers from maintaining someone exclusively on the basis of a civil immigration detainer, a request that a prisoner is not released. Other state laws prevent national and local officials from sharing information with federal immigration authorities and preventing local prisons from working with the federal government to hold people who have been detained for violations of civil immigration.
The lawsuit also challenges a Denver measure that prohibits the use of city resources to help enforce immigration, and a 2017 executive order From the mayor who wanted to “establish Denver as a safe and hospitable city for everyone.”
The court case asks the court to rule the laws unconstitutionally and to ban their enforcement.
“This is a lawsuit to put an end to the disastrous policy and to restore the supremacy of federal immigration legislation,” said the lawsuit.
Many liberal states and cities leaning laws that the local police services mainly like the activities of immigration enforcement have a way to build trust in immigrant communities. Democratic officials in different cities say that the immigrants policy helps to feel comfortable to report crimes and communicate with health departments and schools.
But the White House and other Republican officials say that laws such as these, in so -called sanctuary, make a safe haven to jeopardize criminals and residents.
In a statement, Mr Polis’s office, a Democrat, said that Colorado was not a refuge and that it regularly worked with local, provincial and federal law enforcement.
“If the courts say that a Colorado Act is not valid, we will follow the ruling,” said the statement.
Mr Johnston, also a democrat, said in an interview that his city is already working with federal immigration authorities by honoring requests to inform immigration and customs enforcement or what the agency calls a “removable alien”, about to be released from detention.
At the same time, Mr. Johnston said, he believes that locations such as hospitals, schools and court buildings should be prohibited from enforcement of immigration.
“What we know is that we don’t have thousands of people without papers here with violent criminal histories,” said Mr. Johnston. “That is the myth that has been told.”
According to a survey last summer, general public support for immigration to the United States decreased Under the Biden administration. Some national and local officials are now dampening their language To describe the policy of the sanctuary, and some have tried to separate local measures that limit cooperation with federal officials.
But many civil servants are also confronted by democratic guided states and cities with criticism from their supporters to push back against the hard policy of Mr. Trump.
The lawsuit against Colorado officials is comparable to one of the administration submitted against Illinois and Chicago In February, and one against the city of Rochester, NY, submitted last month. Both lawsuits are underway.
Process is only part of the broader effort of the Trump government to do more states and local law enforcement to help with deportation plans. The administration has sought to block the financing From cities and provinces that do not work together.
President Trump signed one on Monday executive order Pam Bondi, the Attorney General, and Kristi call, the secretary of Homeland Security, lead to Publish a list of state and local jurisdictions that the administration regards as sanctuary cities. It calls for the pursuit of “all necessary legal remedies and enforcement measures” against them.
In Wisconsin, a memo that instructs state employees to call a state lawyer when an ice agent or federal officer visits their workplace led to a sharp warning This week from the president’s border, Tom Homan.
“Wait to see what’s coming,” said Mr. Homan in response to the question of a reporter about the memo.
Government Tony Evers said that he interpreted the comment as “hair -raising threats” that will take the possibility that the chosen officials could be arrested.
Last month, FBI agents arrested a Milwaukee judge For accusation of the impediment of justice, in which authorities said she had led an immigrant without papers from her courtroom by a side door, while federal immigration agents waited in a corridor to arrest him. The legal team of the judge has sworn to dispute the charges.
The Colorado right shop comes shortly after more than 100 people of which federal agents said they were immigrants without papers arrested in a raid From a nightclub in Colorado Springs, according to the Drug Enforcement Administration. About 50 from the city’s police officers helped federal agents.
The mayor of that city, himself an immigrant from Nigeria, told the New York Times that he supported the arrests.
“This immigrant mayor says, if you are illegal here and commit a crime, there must be consequences,” said Mayor Yemi Mobolade, a political independent one. “You have to be deported.”
Mr. Trump has also been taxing another city in Colorado, Aurora, for a long time, as flooded by the Venezuelan street gang, the Aragua. The vast suburb to the east of Denver was one Touchstone for Mr. Trump on the campaign track and shortly after his inauguration, federal agents Falled apartment complexes Immigrants had lived there without working sanitary or heat. ICE would not say how many people were arrested in that raid, or that it had held gang members.
The lawsuit that was brought on Friday again called on Aurora and claimed that the Aragua took control of apartment buildings in that city as “the direct by -product of the sanctuary policy pushed by the state of Colorado.”
Aurora officials have said that those claims are greatly exaggerated.
Reporting was contributed by Jack Healy” Julie Bosman” Mitch Smith” Hamed Aleziz” Tim Arango And Ernesto Londoño.
- Advertisement -