Take a fresh look at your lifestyle.

Trump again focuses on foreign help.

- Advertisement -

0

President Trump proposed on Friday to beat $ 163 billion in federal expenditure on Friday, a drastic cut in the role and reach of the government that, if determined, would eliminate a huge set of climate, health and housing programs, including some that benefit the arms.

- Advertisement -

Mr. Trump issued his first budget proposal and sketched Mr. Trump a vague image of Washington. His blueprint issued many core functions such as awake, armed, wasting or radical, because the president looked at his request to justify that congress is cutting domestic expenses in the lowest level in the modern era.

Mr. Trump suggested reducing financing for federal law enforcement, including the FBI that he called upon to defeat money to defeat money for the tax evasion of the police at the Internal Revenue Service. He ordered to save billions of funds that help finance clean water projects. And the president has reserved some of his deepest cuts for education, health and science, including the National Institutes of Health and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, which would lower their budgets by about half.

Democrats immediately punished Mr Trump for his proposal. Senator Chuck Schumer from New York, the Senate Line Leader, called it “heartless” and “a total attack on hard -working Americans.” Even some Republicans had endorsed the budget of Mr Trump, although others, such as speaker Mike Johnson, the blueprint.

Mr. Trump also asked the congress to reduce billions of dollars in federal help, if not to remove the poorest Americans. Firstly, the White House called for reconfiguring federal programs that offer rental assistance to low -income families, which reduced the aid with more than $ 26 billion the next tax year. And the administration proposed the termination of a federal initiative, supported by some Republicans, who help needy families to pay for their monthly heating accounts.

In one of the few expenditure increases included in the budget, Mr Trump asked the legislators to strengthen the expenditure at the Ministry of Interior Security by more than $ 43 billion, which promotes his work to combat immigration, perform deportations and build a wall along the border between the US and Mexican. The president also asked more than $ 1 trillion for the next tax year.

But he asked the legislators to approve that one-off basis, as part of a broader legislative package-paralyard this year intended to promote the president’s tax agenda. The approach made an angry some republicans, who indicated that they would pursue a greater increase in military expenses as part of the annual process to finance government agencies and programs.

“It is strange how much time the president’s advisors spend on repairing peace through strength, given how apparently unwilling they have been to invest accordingly in the national defense or in other critical instruments of national power,” said Senator Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, the former senate leader of the Publicons, the Publicons, the Publicons The Publicons The Public Health Die The Publicators, The Publicatores The Public Health Die The “The Publications The Public Health Leader stated.

For Mr Trump, the budget served to formalize his conservative vision and his disturbing reorganization of the government, a campaign that has already concluded entire agencies and has dismissed thousands of federal employees without the explicit approval of the congress.

Some of Mr. Trump’s proposed military increases can benefit Elon Musk, the technical billionaire that Mr Trump has advised on cost savings as part of the Department of Government Efficiency

Mr. Trump’s budget supported the establishment of a new rocket defense shield and a renewed campaign for ‘American space travel dominance’. Both are areas in which Mr. Musk and his rocket company, SpaceX, can remain to win large contracts that are financed by an increase in expenditure.

In a letter on Friday at the accompaniment of the spending blue pressure, said Russell T. Vought, the leader of the Budget Office of the White House, said that the administration had produced its entry after a “rigorous, line-by-line assessment of the expenditure.”

Mr. Vought added that the President tried to eradicate money “in contrast to the needs of ordinary working Americans and tilted in the direction of the financing of niche, non -governmental organizations and higher education institutions dedicated to radical gender and climate ideologies to the American way of life.”

Sharon Parrott, the president of the left -loving center about budget and policy priorities, said that many of the budget changes considered by Mr. Trump were most likely to fall the hardest on Americans with a low income, in particular those who trust government services.

“This is the last rejection of a part of what he promised on the campaign track are in terms of President who would like to try to serve people who struggled in the margins of the economy,” she said.

Mr. Trump’s proposal is not a law. A total of around $ 1.7 trillion, after taking into account the full set of expenditure changes that the president is looking for, the budget only serves as a formal guide for the congress, where it immediately generated opposition.

“President Trump has made his priorities clear as a day: he wants the Defund programs downright programs that help Americans work while shaking massive tax benefits in billionaires and taxes on the middle class Americans with his reckless rates,” said Senator Patty Murray van Wasyton, in the Democracy of Docraying’s Comraying, in the DemoTy Murraying. A statement.

The criticism was not limited to Democrats, because the Republicans also alerted about spending cuts for some programs that serve the necessary Americans. Senator Susan Collins, a Republican who leads Maine Republican who leads the credit committee, expressed her ‘serious objections’.

By releasing the budget, Mr. Trump was the scene for what is bound by a complicated, months of process to finance the government and to avert a closure before an existing expenditure deal ends on 30 September. Entering that fight have many Republicans the wish of Mr. Trump held back to reduce federal expenses, although Gop’s War Development has shown in the course of the exact scope.

The party’s laws have also raced to identify potentially trillion dollars in cuts that they can include to finance a related package that would expand a series of forged tax reductions for families and companies, one of the signature of the president – and most expensive – economic policy priorities.

But Mr. Trump’s proposal has extra meaning. He and his top budget adviser, Mr. Vought, subscribe to the idea that the supreme commander has an extensive authority to stop or cancel the expenses, even if the congress instructs otherwise. Their vision has cleared the way for the administration to delay, freeze or cancel billions of dollars of funds, which means a wide range of lawsuits and has put forward more than three dozen federal investigations into their activities.

On Friday Mr. Trump’s proposal left some of the most important questions in which Washington and his finances against Washington and his finances were found. It was silent about the fiscal process of the nation, even if the president wants to reduce taxes in a vast and precious legislative package that has significant implications for the $ 36 trillion debts of the nation.

“It is still to be seen what the rest of the president’s proposals will entail, and there is still the question of Multitrillion-Dollar or the reconciliation law will blow up,” said Maya MacGuineas, the president of the Commission for a responsible federal budget, a group that advocates a shortage of reduction.

Neither has the new budget of the President tackled the future of the federal benefit programs, including social security, Medicare and Medicaid, which each year include the largest share of federal expenditure. Some Republicans are particularly interested in reconsidering Medicaid, which offers health insurance to poor families, as a source of savings to pay their tax cuts.

The administration is expected to send these details to the congress in a more complete budget as soon as this month.

Reporting was contributed by Alan RappeportSheryl Gay StolbergCatie EdmondsonEric LiptonDevlin BarrettLisa FriedmanBrad PlumerMadeleine NGO And Alicia Parlapiano.

- Advertisement -

- Advertisement -

- Advertisement -

Leave A Reply

Your email address will not be published.