Trump’s budget proposal falls flat with some important republicans in the congress

President Trump’s budget attracted harsh criticism from a trio of powerful Republican senators on Friday, who rejected what they said, hopelessly insufficient means for the army, and suggested that they would ignore his plan and ensure that the congress offered much more money for their priorities.

In separate statements, the Senior Republicans – Senators Roger Wicker from Mississippi, the chairman of the Armed Services Committee; Susan Collins van Maine, the chairman of the credit committee; and Mitch McConnell van Kentucky, the chairman of the subcommittee of the credit loans – expressed their contempt for Mr Trump’s proposal.

Their collective pushback came down to a rare moment of challenges at a time when Republicans on Capitol Hill did little to do the efforts of the White House to reduce the federal programs.

Mr. Wicker said that the proposed military spending levels of the administration “our military capacities and our support for service members would shred the bone.”

“President Trump successfully campaigned on a peace through strength agenda, but his advisers from the Office of Management and Budget apparently did not listen,” said Mr Wicker. He said that Mr. Trump’s budget would effectively decrease military financing for the fifth consecutive year, “what a reduction is.”

Congress Republicans are planning to approve around $ 150 billion in new defense expenses through their vast tax reductions legislation. It is intended for specific new projects as a boost for general use for the budget of the Pentagon. In their budget requests, administration officers confused in that money and claimed that they intended to increase military expenses by 13 percent.

Hawkish Republicans on Capitol Hill see that Gambit as an accounting gimmick and want to see the military spending levels increased by the regular credit process.

“Make no mistake: a one -off approval of the consent is not a replacement for loans for the entire year,” said Mr. McConnell. “It’s a supplement.”

Mrs. Collins, who called the budget proposal ‘Laat’ and had no important details, nevertheless made it clear that she did not approve it.

After a provisional assessment, she said, she had “serious objections” against the defense section. And she criticized Mr. Trump’s plan to close or eliminate the domestic programs, including the Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program, that helps to compensate for high -utensic accounts for people with a low income throughout the country; Another that offers federal educational services to students with disadvantaged backgrounds; And others who support biomedical research.

“Eventually,” she noticed in her statement, “it is the congress that has the power of the wallet.”

Mr. McConnell also noted in his statement that only the congress could set and approve the federal spending levels, and that legislators often ignore the figures laid down in the president’s budget request.

“America cannot expect that our allies will do not do higher annual defense expenditure if we are not willing to set the right example,” said Mr. McConnell, the former Republican leader. “Fortunately, presidential budget requests are exactly that: requests. The congress will soon have the opportunity to ensure that the American power – and the credibility of our obligations – have been collected correctly. I hope and expect my colleagues to participate in the national security of America first.”

Many Republicans welcomed Mr. Trump’s budget, which speaker Mike Johnson called a “bold blueprint that reflects the values ​​of hard -working Americans and the dedication to American strength and prosperity.”

But the different opinion of some Republican legislators in both rooms was remarkable at a time when few of them spoke about one of the president’s movements.

Reporter Mike Lawler, Republican of New York, called it Cut to the Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program “Recsy” and said it would leave his voters “in the cold”.

Representative Mike Rogers, Republican of Alabama and the chairman of the Armed Services Committee, said that he was “very concerned that the requested basic budget for defense does not reflect a realistic path to build the military capacity that we need to reach the peace of President Trump.”