Why VMWare’s strengths no longer justify modern complexity
While VMware has long been a cornerstone of IT infrastructure, it is becoming increasingly clear that it poses a number of challenges that should not be overlooked. Let’s start with the financial consequences. VMware’s licensing and subscription fees are significant to say the least, and the complexity of the licensing structure doesn’t help matters. It often feels like navigating a maze to find the right package, and recurring maintenance costs only add to the burden. Then there is the problem of ‘vendor lock-in’. When we commit to VMware, we commit to its entire ecosystem, which limits our flexibility. As multi-cloud strategies and open source solutions become more prevalent, the risk of being boxed in by a single provider’s roadmap grows. The dependency is real, and so is the challenge of migrating to other platforms: it is complex and expensive.
From a performance perspective, VMware’s architecture is starting to show its age. It may not be the best solution for modern cloud-native workloads such as containerized environments or latency-sensitive applications such as AI. The overhead and scalability limitations inherent in VMware’s design mean that we don’t always optimize every byte of memory or every watt of power, which is a concern in today’s performance-oriented world. Additionally, when considering innovation, we must recognize that VMware, despite its dominance, has lagged behind in adopting new technologies such as edge computing, containerization, and advanced AI automation. It feels like the market is moving faster than VMware’s ability to keep pace.
Cloud Solutions Fellow at SoftIron.
Risk of exposure
Operationally, VMware introduces meaningful complexity. Managing and maintaining the environment often requires highly specialized skills, and the fragmentation of the ecosystem – with each product having its own management interface – can lead to unnecessary administrative overhead. Version updates require operators to maintain comprehensive dependency graphs and matrix diagrams to ensure that changes to one part of the system don’t crash the other. This complexity also extends to security. VMware has faced a large number of vulnerabilities, and slow patch deployment increases the risk of exposure. Integrating third-party cybersecurity tools isn’t always easy, leaving us with systems that aren’t as secure as they need to be in an era when cyber threats are at an all-time high. We are faced with swallowing the bitter pill of potential downtime from exposure or potential downtime from installing the patch to restore the exposure.
The lack of a cloud-native focus is another concern. VMware’s traditional VM-centric architecture doesn’t mesh well with today’s cloud-native and DevOps approaches, where containers, microservices, and automation are the driving forces. While VMware offers solutions like Tanzu, they are not as efficient or deeply integrated as competitors built from the ground up for these purposes. This disconnect also complicates multi-cloud strategies: despite VMware’s efforts, achieving true flexibility and integration across different cloud platforms remains a challenge. For the indefinite future, ‘legacy’ software will remain in our data centers; this is a given. However, the reality is that we need the best of both worlds: the ability to manage, secure, and scale these legacy workloads while we design, develop, and deploy more resilient cloud-native solutions, driving availability and recovery to the application layer pushed.
Problematic implementation
Implementation and scalability can also be problematic. VMware deployments can take a lot of time and effort, and scaling often requires careful planning and excessive hardware investments, something that cloud-native platforms handle with much more flexibility. Managing dynamic, short-lived workloads in a VMware environment is particularly challenging, which is at odds with modern IT practices that prioritize agility. Energy efficiency is another factor; VMware environments are not always optimized for power consumption, leading to higher operational costs, especially in large data centers.
Migration paths away from VMware can be expensive and complex, further reinforcing the sense of lock-in in the ecosystem. Smaller deployments (tens to hundreds of VMs) aren’t incredibly difficult to move, but when you look at moving thousands of VMs, all with interconnected dependencies between applications and hardware, assigning them to a new platform is like horror movies. by. Even with solutions like Tanzu, VMware’s capabilities for managing container environments are fragmented, requiring additional licenses and tools to operate efficiently. This lack of native integration with modern DevOps methodologies, infrastructure-as-code practices, and agile development processes is becoming increasingly apparent. VMware may have been a leader in the past, but as our IT strategies move toward automation and flexibility, it feels like VMware is struggling to keep pace.
While it’s easy to scrutinize technology decisions, it’s just as important to recognize where a solution has excelled, and where VMware certainly has its strengths. VMware has been the gold standard in virtualization for years, offering rock-solid stability and reliability that IT departments have come to depend on. Regardless of the nuances, VMware has paved the way for some fundamentally crucial technological developments. vSphere has been instrumental in maximizing hardware utilization, allowing us to run multiple workloads efficiently and securely on a single host. This has not only reduced the proliferation of physical servers, but also significantly reduced the cost of data centers – an area where VMware’s impact has been undeniably positive.
We recommended the best virtual machine software.
This article was produced as part of TechRadarPro’s Expert Insights channel, where we profile the best and brightest minds in today’s technology industry. The views expressed here are those of the author and are not necessarily those of TechRadarPro or Future plc. If you are interested in contributing, you can read more here:
