Wimbledon in Chaos After Ai Line Judge Bungles calls against the opponent of Sonay Kartal – who claims that she has ‘stolen’ her game and claims that pro -British bias days after Emma Raducanu took a wipe to technology

Wimbledon Were engaged in another shameful Line-Call-Controverse when Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova accused officials of Pro-Brit Bias after the Hawkeye technology had not called in a crucial match against Sonay Kartal.

Only a few days after Emma Raducanu Kartal closed the ‘Dodgy’ technology and struck a ball far beyond the basic line in her fourth round collision with Pavlyuchenkova, while the Russian had an advantage for only a call to come out of the automated system in the middle of the court.

After a long delay, while chairman referee Nico Helwerth was on his phone on the court to reach the bottom of the Farcical situation, he stated: “Unfortunately, the electronic line system could not follow the last point, so we will play the point again.”

Kartal continued breaking and applied for a furious Pavlyuchenkova to accuse officials of favoring her British opponent.

“I don’t know if it’s in or it’s out,” she raged. ‘How do I know that? You can’t prove it. Because she is locally, they can say anything. You took the game from me. ‘

Helworth replied: ‘The problem is that we have to go with the system. If they tell me it is active, we can do nothing. If they tell me they don’t have it, that is unfortunately the rule. ‘

This ball from Sonay Kartal was not called up as the AI ​​line judge who did not function on Sunday

Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova could not believe the decision and announced her feelings

“They stole the game of mine,” replied Pavlyuchenkova, who was still going to get the opening set. “They stolen it.”

The championships have been marred by Dodgy Decisions since the controversial decision to delete traditional human line judges in favor of AI – and it has now been made more often that the referee is unable to make their own decision when the system fails.

A tearing Raducanu hit the technology in her press conference after her defeat against Aryna Sabalenka earlier this week. At a certain moment during the match, she asked the referee: “You saw it too, right?”

“It’s a bit disappointing, the tournament here that the calls can be so wrong, but for the most part they are fine,” said Raducanu in her press conference. ‘It’s just, like, I also had a few in my other competitions that have been very wrong. Hopefully they can repair that.

“No, I don’t do that,” she replied when he was asked if she trusted the technology. “I think the other players would say the same thing, there were some pretty dodgy, but what can you do?”

Colleague British No1 Jack Draper also questioned the accuracy of technology this week, who also believed that some phone calls were wrong during his defeat against Marin Cilic.

“I don’t think it’s 100 percent accurate, in all honesty,” he said after his second second round Exit. “A few of those today, it showed a stamp on the field. There is no way in which the chalk would have demonstrated. “

Groot -Britain Kartal continued to save the Spelfoute and then break her Russian opponent

The German referee Nico Helwerth made the decision to play the point again, despite the clear error

Wimbledon hit the claims on Saturday when Debbie Jevans, chairman of the All England Club, insisted that she had faith in the accuracy of technology.

“It’s funny, right, because when we had lines, we were constantly asked why we had no electronic line groups because it is more accurate than the rest of the Tour,” she told the BBC.

‘The players wanted it because they asked us, why do we have linesmen? Because of possible human errors. And now we are in situ.

“We have to think of innovation and we just move with what the court and usually what the players expect.”