Within the bizarre five -year battle of the dog owner to defend his two Jack Russells – because he is now running the risk of losing his house after expressing $ 100k in legal costs

A dog owner who has pronounced more than $ 100,000 who defends his two Jack Russells in an amazing five -year legal battle says that his pets have done nothing wrong.

Glenn Tong was sued in October 2020 by the Boroenondara Council for allowing his dogs, Marco and Mia, to bark exaggerated in his house in the Hawthorn in the east Melbourne outskirts.

The dog owner was then found guilty and told Daily Mail Australia that he runs the risk of losing his house if he does not appeal against the verdict.

Mr. Tong has already spent more than $ 100,000 to defend Marco and Mia and estimates that he will pay at least $ 60,000 more.

The original complaint accused Mr Tong of it to let the dogs bark exaggerated, especially early in the morning and late in the evening.

It was claimed that barking was a nuisance for his neighbors.

Mr. Tong, the Chief Executive of Biotech Company VGI Health, objected to the complaint and is determined that his dogs are not the fault.

“When the council asked me,” are they barking your dogs? “I said no because these dogs sleep in bed with me and my wife,” he said.

Glenn Tong was sued by the Boroonondara Council for allowing his dogs, Marco and Mia, to bark excessively, in his apartment near Hawthorn

Buren complained that Marco and Mia ‘barked’ everywhere in the early hours of the morning and late at night

‘If the dogs bark, we would know, they will sleep under the duvet between us. But the council did not listen. ‘

Mr. Tong insisted that he had a ‘good relationship’ with most neighbors in his apartment building and that the small minority that complained was ‘mostly old people’.

Four years after he was sued, Mr. Tong appeared in Melbourne ‘Court in the hope of pleading his case with his legal team last year, but claimed that he received a’ truncated hearing ‘.

Mr. Tong and his dogs are represented by the only dog ​​lawyer Brett Melke and criminal lawyer Tass Antos.

“The magistrate was adamant to end the hearing on a certain date, although we told her with that time frame, there is no way in which we can present our proof well,” said Mr. Tong.

‘My lawyer, my lawyer and I have decided that if we cannot present our proof properly, we will let us make sure that we do not provide any evidence.

Mr. Tong was found guilty, fined $ 2300 and ordered a professional trainer to involve his dogs.

His legal team immediately filed a profession, of which he said it was “all part of our strategy.”

Mr. Tong has spent more than $ 100,000 to defend his dogs in court

Explanation why this issue is so important to him, Mr. Tong said that he would “never owe guilty for accusations that I am not guilty.”

“The dogs clearly don’t bark, they bark, every dog ​​barks,” he said.

‘The claim of dogs that bark early in the morning, late in the evening, every day and that they respond to every stimuli is completely nonsense. ‘

“I am not guilty and the dogs are not either.”

Mr Tong is confronted with a fine of $ 198 for each dog, a total of $ 396.

Mr. Tong will come back in November for a hearing of 10 days, where 23 witnesses have been set to provide evidence.

He insisted that he does not care about the money.

“I fight for my house and my dogs,” he said.

The businessman feared that the complaining neighbors could bring the guilty judgment to a tribunal and explain his dogs.

Mr Tong fears that he could be ordered to give Marco and Mia if his neighbors take him to a tribunal after the guilty verdict

“They could give a disposal order, so I would be ordered to remove the dogs within 28 days and that won’t happen,” he said.

“Our dogs are our lives. They go everywhere with us. If we have the assignment to remove them from our house, we would have to move and find another house. ‘

Mr Tong has one Gofundme Page In the name of Marco and Mia to finance the lawsuit.

Daily Mail Australia has contacted the Boroonondara council for comment.